A new report from a special UN investigator says drone strikes have killed far more civilians than US officials have publicly acknowledged – at least 400 in Pakistan and as many as 58 in Yemen – and chides the US for failing to aid the investigation by disclosing its own figures.
UN Special Rapporteur Ben Emmerson, who issued the “interim” report, said the US had created “an almost insurmountable obstacle to transparency”, reported NBC NEWS.
“The Special Rapporteur does not accept that considerations of national security justify withholding statistical and basic methodological data of this kind,” wrote Emmerson in the report, which is due to be presented to the UN General Assembly next Friday.
US intelligence officials have consistently downplayed the number of civilian deaths from drone strikes. In a June 2011 speech, White House counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan, who is now CIA director, said that “for nearly the past year, there hasn’t been a single collateral death because of the exceptional proficiency [and] precision” of US counter-terror strikes.
Later, the CIA acknowledged some civilian casualties, but told Congress that they were in the “single digits”, according to a February 2013 statement by Senate Intelligence Committee chair Sen Diane Feinstein, D-Calif.
In a major speech on drone strikes this May, President Obama openly acknowledged civilian deaths, saying “they will haunt us for as long as we live” — but didn’t provide any hard numbers or estimates.
“It is a hard fact that US strikes have resulted in civilian casualties, a risk that exist in every war,” Obama said. “And for the families of those civilians, no words or legal construct can justify their loss.”
According to Emmerson, the Pakistani government provided him with new casualty numbers for strikes in the country’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), where the US government has targeted al Qaeda operatives and their associates since 2004. While acknowledging the difficulty in compiling precise figures in a region largely beyond government control, he states that Pakistani officials confirmed “at least 400 civilians had been killed as a result of remotely piloted aircraft strikes and a further 200 individuals [killed] were regarded as probably non-combatants”.
He added that Pakistani officials said those figures were likely to be an underestimate, due to “underreporting and obstacles to effective investigation”.
Emmerson told NBC News that there is no reason “on the face of it” to question the Pakistani government’s number because they were broadly in line with the lower end of figures compiled by non-governmental groups and independent media monitoring. He said one major difficulty in calculating any numbers is a differing view of who constitutes a civilian. Pakistani officials, he said, tend to view the owner of a home where suspected al Qaeda operatives are staying as a non-combatant, an assessment not generally shared by US officials.
Emmerson also said he and his researchers had identified 33 “sample remotely piloted aircraft strikes that appear to have resulted in civilian casualties”. Most of these were by the US, he said, but about “eight or nine” were Israeli strikes in Gaza. He did not identify the strikes, saying he is still investigating them and plans to present his findings to the UN Human Rights Council.
The highest level of civilian casualties, Emmerson said, occurred when the CIA ramped up drone strikes in Pakistan between 2008 and 2010. Since then, he said, drone strikes in Pakistan have steadily declined and “the number of civilian deaths has dropped dramatically.”
Emmerson’s estimate of civilian casualties from drone strikes in Yemen ranged from 21 to 58.
A former Pakistani official told NBC News that the figures the Pakistani government supplied to Emmerson were much higher than earlier estimates and could have been influenced by domestic politics, given mounting domestic resistance in that country to US drone operations.
The number is still “significant”, said Letta Taylor, a senior counter-terrorism researcher for Human Rights Watch, because it is the first time a United Nations investigator has attached specific numbers to the issue of civilian death. She acknowledged, however, that “all the figures are estimates. We’re all operating in an information blackout”.
In a statement, White House spokesperson Laura Magnuson said, “We are aware that this report has been released and are reviewing it carefully.”
She noted that at the National Defence University on May 23, “[T]he president spoke at length about the policy and legal rationale for how the United States takes action against al Qaeda and its associated forces. As the president emphasised, the use of lethal force, including from remotely piloted aircraft, commands the highest level of attention and care. Of particular note, before we take any counter-terrorism strike, there must be near-certainty that no civilians will be killed or injured – the highest standard we can set.”
