What should a leader do?
Predicting the future is never easy. All major corporations and nations devote substantial efforts towards devising processes and technologies that assist in managing information and knowledge, and to help understand the future. The more accurately one can grasp the emerging world; the better one can plan and choose the course.
A related debate has to with if deductive or inductive reasoning better for this task. Furthermore, whether the right or left-brain people more suited at seeing patterns and trends and provide the clues about what is coming. One of the key shortcoming in this regard is that human operates from what is known. While new discoveries give further credence to the fact that there is a lot we do not know. Even the best-developed models can be thrown off by a single anomaly, as the proponents of chaos theory would claim.
A lot also depends on the assumptions and frame of reference being used to grasp a given reality. Now a day’s, media plays an important role in framing peoples’ perceptions about what that may be. Despite the limitations, the worse mistake is not to have predicted wrongly, but to have not even made indigenous attempts to understand the future. In absence of this effort, one is prone in believing what others may conceive.
For more than a decade now, the politics of Pakistan has been disproportionately impacted by the war on terror. In addition to widespread corruption and poor governance, this has caused economic stagnation and the energy crisis. In other words, the internal and external problems of the country have become linked. The nation cannot walk away from the war on terror, and the more it stays involved; its economic and security situation worsens further.
For example, two prominent thoughts have emerged about where Pakistan is heading in the US. One of them presents a pessimistic and damning view that the nation is gradually spinning out of control, extremism is spreading, and the point of no return is approaching quickly. The scholars with this view are often older and have been dealing with affairs of Pakistan for an extended period of time. One senses exasperation in their demeanor. It appears to be an after effect of having dealt with the complex Afghanistan situation and the difficult Pakistan-India relations, and to make sense of it in the context of war on terror.
A little bit optimistic version usually comes from the relatively younger intellectual community of the think tanks. The hopefulness is premised on the economic prospects the region, manifesting in the form regional trade and energy dealings. Generally, there is an emphasis on promoting the civilian government as opposed to depending on the military.
On the other hand, it is equally critical to understand the trends impacting the surrounding region where nationalism, conservatism and security concerns are resurgent. The developing global competition between China and the US, the impact of BRICS, and the traditional tussles between the Arabs, Persian and the Turks, are all equally important considerations.
The consequences of climatic changes, especially the frequent flooding and predicted acute shortage of water will have no less impact on the region as population continues to explode.
The key question is how much are Pakistan’s leaders, of all shapes and forms, preparing the nation for these trends and challenges. With in this inquiry, lies another major dilemma that the leaders of both developed and developing world are facing. Is the job of a leader to educate their voters about the most serious issues and provide them with a new vision, direction, and solution to what is not working? Or, do they just simply represent popular voices in the short term to win votes, while leading the citizens towards oblivion in the long run.
The political dynamics of Pakistan, and many other places for that matter, are stuck in a vicious cycle. The past and present political mistakes result in a reactionary cycle. And, the reactionary politics may not be what is required to deal with the emerging world. For example, nationalistic, conservative and religious forces are on the rise in Pakistan as well as in the Middle East. This may have to do with war on terror, change in the global balance of power and associated economic influence. Although it is important to understand the deeper reasons producing this change, more critical is to understand where this dynamics may lead to if left unchecked.
Consider the example of Egypt. After years of Mubarak rule, a Muslim Brotherhood-led government came into power. While the uprising there was spearheaded by younger liberal elements, they were not organized enough to benefit from what transpired as a result of their efforts. Now, faced with economic constraints, the Morsi government is being forced to take some of the same steps Mubarak was blamed for, and in the end may also cause its decay. American economic assistance to Egypt is linked with continuing the peace treaty with Israel. The big question in these circumstances is what will follow if Morsi fails, and will the pendulum shift to liberal forces, or even more radical elements.
As is happening in the region, the conservative, nationalist and moderate religious elements are likely to win in Pakistan’s elections. However, they may require the help of liberals to form the government. Such a divisive polity is unlikely to be highly decisive and the governance will obviously suffer once more. In the long run, continued failure to deliver will result in more support for hard-line elements and against dealing with the west. This is not very difficult to forecast.
Predicting the results of Pakistan’s elections is not that hard. How to avert the expected paralysis is where most of the focus is needed.
To do this will require a visionary, pragmatic, and persuasive leadership that does not have to spend majority of its time on its own survival.
The writer is chief analyst at PoliTact, a Washington based futurist advisory firm (www.PoliTact.com and http:twitter.com/politact) and can be reached at [email protected]
A third class article at best. After forcing us to suffer a long harangue about the importance of all such efforts to try and figure out future events and the various factors involved in this rather complicated enterprise, the learned author produces half a paragraph of actual prediction at the very end of his long write up – and that too rather pedestrian. A Rakshawala or your barber would have done a better job for you without wasting your time.
A third class article at best. After forcing us to suffer a long harangue about the importance of all such efforts to try and figure out future events and the various factors involved in this rather complicated enterprise, the learned author produces half a paragraph of actual prediction at the very end of his long write up – and that too rather pedestrian. A Rakshawala or your barber would have done a better job for you without wasting your time.
i cannot agree more with you
Awful article
"The writer is chief analyst at PoliTact, a Washington based futurist advisory firm"
D@mn! So much for PoliTact!!!! Any cr@p can earn a dollar these days it seems….
absolute crap ! , if i was to be given a lecture on what predicting the future means or how hard it is…i would take an actual lecture. and talking about Egypt and America , we can all see what happened. waste of time.
for those who cant see a prediction in this article let me put it simple worlds. majority will b one by moderate islamic parties that is nawaz sharif and imran khan with one odd liberal party that is mqm or anp sharing the government. resultant govt will be confused and indecisive on the three most important things; dealing with taliban, relation with west and whether to tell the directionless/passionate youth the truth about pakistan or to continue with anti american rhetoric. result: pakistan will be in a bigger mess in near future whether it is nawaz sharif or the qaid e azam imran khan:-)……if u are looking for number of seats here it is…pmln around 100, ppp around 40 and qaid e azam around 30:-)….but like the worthy author has mentioned, lets think beyond seats, lets think about the real future:-)
Want to see Pakistan as a nation grow, prosper, emerge, positively change or do you want to see it stay corrupted, under-developed, and miserable? Your call. It’s your vote in which Pakistan- “our” nation’s name and fate lies. Please think wisely.
I am not trying to criticise any particular political party here nor am I going to force any of you to vote for a particular person. All I want to say is do not make the same mistake some of us did in the past. Just look at our country. Don’t you want to actually feel proud of it? Wouldn’t you want to be recongnised as an educated, literate, moderate, non-corrupted and advanced nation not only nationally but also interationally? It’s a pity that people would want to vote for such people that have done nothing but taken all it’s assets and have stuffed their own pockets in the last ten years.
Vote for some one who promises to bring a change. Whose Tsunami will eradicate corruption. Whose symbollic bat will score high at every given chance. Who believes that this nation needs to be saved rather than driven apart. Be wise.
“I have always believed that one should not be scared of losing, I think that really is the key…”
“I believed in myself. I never imagined myself as just an ordinary player.”- Imran Khan.
nice article. Really nice thoughts on pakistan's future. Hope to see some good results in elections.
An excellant article,for an audience of vision and political understanding.
Comments are closed.