India’s strategy

3
143

Ceasefire violations and attempts at isolation

 

In his briefing to the Senate the newly appointed defence secretary provided information on increased and ‘unusual’ Indian movement along the LOC. Apart from the 58 ceasefire violations since the Uri attack an additional division of the Indian army has been placed on the LOC and a squadron of Russian SU-35’s has been brought to the forward base. These developments at the LOC combined with an incident of firing at the working boundary in Shakargarh sector suggests that India will continue intensifying such activity without any let up.

 

There have been multiple appeals by the international community to resolve the ongoing spat through diplomacy. India however is unwilling to come to the talking table and is unlikely to do so until after their legislative elections to be held in 2017 in important states that include Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat. The BJP hence ill affords any leeway with Pakistan in terms of talks and has to keep up its increasing army pressure along the border to win the elections. Pakistan on the other hand is open to talks but only if they are meaningful and include all issues, not just terrorism.

 

In addition to the border incidents India continues to make attempts at isolating Pakistan.  Events such as the PACES competition being hosted by Pakistan army in Lahore with participation from armies of 14 countries and Pakistan army winning competition in UK highlight India’s failure to that end. Myanmar’s leader, Aung San Suu Kyi’s, has maintained soon after the BRICS moot  that what needs to be isolated  is terrorism rather than  countries – a clear critique of India’s isolation attempts. Therefore any isolation that Pakistan faces in terms of unfavorable relations with Afghanistan and Bangladesh or the US for example is solely our own doing.

 

While India will continue with its two pronged strategy Pakistan should remain steadfast on using diplomacy while remaining wary of any misadventure on the boarder – something that would unnecessarily inflame an already tense situation.

 

3 COMMENTS

  1. People in India are frankly very angry about terrorist attach emanating from across the boarder. Most people in India has concluded that talking to Pakistan will not result in any meaningful results as far as Pakistan relies on terrorist to create problems in India. As a matter of fact, Indian people are angry towards government of India for not doing enough to stop terrorists and Pakistan and always talking with Pakistan(7 decades) without results.

  2. Editorial quotes Aung San Kyi who does like to be interviewed by a Muslim. Editorial quotes Myanmar which gave azadi to muslims by throwing them into sea. Just watch horrible videos on you tube. I am surprised that editorial has not mentioned atom bomb which every Sheikh, Khan, Mohammed or Fatima mentions. Pakistan wants plibicite in Kashmir.. well if it happens then simultaneously plibicite will be going on India to clear India of Muslim..If a small country like Burma csn do it then why not India. After 1947, all muslim in india living illegally. India gets Hindu refugees from Pakistan daily, the day India reciprocated by sending just fee lakhs of Muslims refugees to Pakistan, Pakistan will understand what is at stake. Modi is proving to be week leader, but vacuum gets filled. Why so called Kashmir issue is not resolved becuase Indians do not distinguishe between Kashmiri Muslim and 200 Million Muslims living in India. Fate of Kashmiri Muslims and Indian Muslim is together. I have never seen this much hatered for muslims in india ever before. EDITORIAL SHOULD ANALYZE IMPACT OF KASHMIRI MUSLIM ON MUSLIM LIVING IN INDIA.

Comments are closed.