Malala and fatwa

12
139

The right to education

In Islamic Jurisprudence, a fatwa is a legal ruling or opinion issued by an Islamic scholar. In technical terms, it is a code of law derived from the Quran and from the teachings and actions of Mohammed (PBUH). The reason for providing the above very basic definition is tragic and seriously shocking in the context of modern world. The term fatwa has been used daily by quasi-religious leaders for their own makeshift beliefs to prove their sociopathic attitude in the light of Quran and Sunnah. Verily, the real sanctity of the legal principle of fatwa is continuing to lose its importance and meaning.

Recently, as reported in the Huffington Post, Islamic radicalists and rather controversial clerics in Britain have prepared a fatwa on Malala Yousafzai. The 14-year-old girl will be declared apostate and accused for turning her back on Islam. The statement issued against Malala states that “If someone apostatises like this woman did by allying with the Americans and saying her favourite person is (Barack) Obama and that she does not want the Sharia or hijab and wants to live under a secular state, she has put herself in a very precarious situation. It is no surprise what happened to her in Pakistan. Malala is mature Islamically, she is not immature, she has reached that period we say is adulthood.”

So, as per the charges levied on Malala by alleged attackers and these radicalist thinkers, she is being charged with idealising Obama, not wearing hijab and declaring herself pro-secular. Such hatred and cowardice can never be the voice of my religion. Our beliefs about Islam as the most tolerant and advanced religion of human history are based on the teachings of Islam. The ones targeting these teaching are not Muslims but the real enemies of Islam. The fatwa should be targeted at these religious criminals and not the ones who are trying to reform the society.

Ironically, the radical extremist working on this fatwa is living in a “non-Muslim country” with precariously an anti-Islam environment and very secular approach towards clothing. The concept of women education is a test case for our society. They give arguments in favour of blinding the women from their right to education. Historically, the customary approach towards women rights in Pakistan was based on sheer negligence of the state in showing faith in equality of rights. Women were even deprived of their right to vote in recent by-elections in FATA.

For a radical thinker, any girl trying to break into this conservative agenda is an apostate and is worthy to be held accountable for denying the basic teachings of these clerics. Many girls in Pakistan are devoid of their basic right to education due to overly protective approach adopted by their parents. Some do not get to school due to social pressures and the rest of them are deprived of their right to education due to a conservative outlook on the social evils by their blood relations. Thus, females tend to necessarily participate in things felt suited to them by “men”.

Half truth is a lie and these religious clerics have hijacked the teachings of Islam by telling the half truths about Islam. Quran and Sunnah are the basic sources of Islamic jurisprudence and both these sources clearly outline the importance of education for both men and women. The teachings of Islam do not set different standards for the education of men and women. This is a false pretence set by these clowns who are misusing religious teachings. These clerics hinder the progress of Muslims by terrorising people about the afterlife instead of focusing on how to reform the present.

According to a Hadith in Sahih Muslim, “The best of the speech is embodied in the Book of Allah, and the best guidance is the guidance given by Muhammad (PBUH). And the most evil affairs are their (the misguided Muslims) innovations, and every innovation is error.” Most of the radicalists back their agenda with the teachings of Muhammad (PBUH) while they ignore that Muhammad (PBUH) was trying not only to introduce a new faith but was also trying to transform Arabic society. Many of Arabia’s ills laid down by Prophet (PBUH) under the concept of Jahaliya are so strictly followed by these radicalists. One such example is their approach towards education in general and for women in particular. Islam gives its women the right to education, inheritance and right to choose their spouse among countless others. Denying them their basic rights is just going to do more harm.

So, how to move forward? What should be the next step? What Malala suffered in the shape of wounds will soon recover. But she and her family will remain in constant danger of attacks from these radicals. Hundreds of girls schools in Swat have been destroyed in the past three years by these radicals and thousands of girls in northern areas have been deprived of their basic fundamental right to education due to hostility towards women education. The people glorifying the role of the attackers on Malala are cowards and their approach towards religion is a cause of concern for us.

Creating fear, distress and hatred about people of other faiths will not bring good name to Islam. Our main enemy is neither the Christians nor Jews, it is us. They are among us. They know that they are wrong but they are too adamant to admit it and would rather sink this society with their egotistic monopoly on religious thoughts. They have put more restrictions on simple beliefs and have made an earning out of spreading confusion and chaos about our religious.

Can you think of a religion that was meant to bring forward a society suffering from the menace of inequality, injustice and other social evils? Pakistan can achieve all the glory it aims at but only by doing away with the half truth. The state has to play its role in educating the people of this country about the teachings of Islam; otherwise, the worse part of the half truth about Sharia will consume the last ray of hope the people have. Pakistan can only progress through education and denying this basic right to anyone, let alone women, will be more fatal than any other offensive.

The writer can be reached at [email protected]

12 COMMENTS

  1. Half truth is a lie and these religious clerics have hijacked the teachings of Islam by telling the half truths about Islam. Quran and Sunnah are the basic sources of Islamic jurisprudence and both these sources clearly outline the importance of education for both men and women. The teachings of Islam do not set different standards for the education of men and women. This is a false pretence set by these clowns who are misusing religious teachings. These clerics hinder the progress of Muslims by terrorising people about the afterlife instead of focusing on how to reform the present.
    very right…agreed…

  2. you hit the nail on the head…the close minds of these so called religious scholars is now stinking and rotten to the core..people have already rejected them and in their desperation they have become more violent and have lost contact with the aspiration of people.

  3. Apart from few (Like Nouman Ali Khan and Dr Israr), religious clerics of today's world are nothing but half witted selfish agenda following hate inciting narrow minded xenophobic psychopaths.

    People blindly follow them. No one dares to ask about Cleric's education or knowledge of Islamic issues. No one bothers to verify the information..

    They churn out fatwas at the pace of like newspaper factory prints newspapers

  4. Excellent approach… In a way simplied the stuff… and the way article moved towards conclusion by giving solutions, fabulous… Islam k Thaikay-Daar are real enemies of Islam, Agree.

  5. I suspected behind this stone age mentality lies a profound fear that educationally empowered women might destabilise the grip these men have on our – unfortunately illiterate – masses .

  6. it seems, Fatwa has now become the primary source of Islamic Law that need not to be supported by Quran and Hadith..Simply a Pathetic approach…
    well done sir..

  7. 1 of 5: Mr. Amjad, your article is very good in the sense that it depicts the confused state of mind of the Muslim youth (especially Pakistani ones) at large. Your article is based on so many untested assumptions. How are you sure this Fatwa is not according to the 'true' teachings of Islam (You don't know much about Islam, like many others, do you?)? Your statement ''Such hatred and cowardice can never be the voice of my religion" is based on pure emotions and you present no evidence to show that the fatwa against Malala is anti-Islamic, and your claim is really true. Have you researched the primary Islamic sources to actually know what it would say regarding a girl who rejects hijab, prefers secularism over Sharia, and says leader of a non-Muslim state (who is at war with many Muslim countries) is her ideal?

  8. 3 of 5: You need to spend some time to study the primary sources and early Sharia scholars of Islam before making the sweeping statements that anything that is in opposition of your convictions (that are a result of secular, rational thoughts) can never bein accordance with Islam and any backward idea 'can never be the voice of my religion'

  9. 4 of 5: I too was confused about the contradictions in the cleric’s/extremists' fatwas and ideas and my own modern, secular ones. And I too blamed clerics and felt that urge to defend Islam as being compatible with my position, and not theirs. Eventually I had to study Islam in detail in an urge to prove that Islam is compatible with evolved human morality and secularism. And I found out that it is not true. Many of the clerics and extremists might give fatwas and promote ideas that are politically motivated, but majority of views that you and I call extremists are more in accordance with Islam then our views.

  10. 5 of 5: So let us accept the truth that the problem lies as much with the actual religion as with the clerics. A set of beliefs written down 1400 years ago is expected to be incompatible today, and there is nothing wrong with realizing that. And the sooner we realize that the better. Let’s be brave enough to criticize religion where it deserves to be criticized, and not be unfair in placing the whole blame on extremists in an unreasonably emotional urge to exonerate Islam.

  11. our main enemy is neither the christian nor the Jews, it is among us. they are among us.

    agreed …..!

Comments are closed.