Between the devil and deep blue sea
The militants fighting the army in the tribal areas and the extremists operating from the urban centres are two sides of the same coin. Both are motivated by the same ideal: the establishment of Khilafat in the Muslim world – followed by an ultimatum to the rest of the world to accept their ideology or be prepared for annihilation. National states confined within geographical boundaries are, according to them, a violation of the teachings of Islam. They have to be tolerated as long as they can be used as springboards to launch attacks on those contented to live under ‘un-Islamic’ regimes. This is what Brig (retd) Ali and four army officers tried to achieve under the guidance of the Hizbut Tahrir (HuT). The task given to them by the HuT, which ironically calls itself a ‘nonviolent’ organisation, was to eliminate the civilian and military leadership in an air attack to clear the way for establishing Khilafat in Pakistan. As a report published in the media reveals, attempt to seduce the army officers were being made by HuT since at least 2003. One of the officers sentenced was charged with acquiring classified information regarding the locations of operational bases for the United States inside Pakistan, seeking sensitive details about the army operation in the Malakand Division and about the deployment of troops to different operational areas. One wonders if they were not trying to find out where the nuke stockpiles were located.
What surprises one is that while many servicemen who agreed to violate their oath paid the price for the crime, none of the HuT instigators was prosecuted as required under law. This strengthens the perception that a soft corner persists in sections of the establishment for extremists playing possum. A number of leaders in some of the mainstream political parties also share the sentiment. This explains why banned outfits continue to collect funds, hold rallies and indulge in hate speech after changing their names. They spread venomous propaganda against the Shias, the Ahmadis and other religious minorities. They attack democracy calling it a system against the teachings of Islam and advocate turning the state into some kind of theocracy. They claim that Pakistan is specifically meant for their particular sect while declaring the rest as non-Muslims. They spread xenophobia, oppose tolerance and spread hatred.
The establishment has to realise that it cannot hope to win the war against militancy unless it acts against the extremists spewing venom and calling for revenge. As long as they are allowed to produce malcontents filled with malevolence against everyone different from them, the militants will have no shortage of volunteers.
by the way what is the ideology of pakistan?if it is islamic,it must be islamic but not of hut.but of balanced,pragmatic,educated,technologically forward looking islam to make entire world into the fold of islam
The writer of the editorial seems to be paranoid himself; fuming and foaming at the mouth.
Some of the words he used are: Annihilation, Venomous, Xenophobia, Hatred, Revenge, Malcontents, Malevolence, Malcontents etc. If he had any positivity in analysis?
If their is any balanced approach across media to analyse delicate issues like these, that too in editorials?? If the idea of Khilafat is merely to be hated? Any form of it? What will you call Maulana Muhammad Ali Jauhar, the leader of Khilafat Movement in British India?
At least you may support the idea of Khilafat, though the process to set up Khilafat might be debatable.
All the great names are being misused. The criminals and terrorists uses the names of Khilafat, Islam, Pakistan etc to cheat the innocent peole.
Comments are closed.