Raging bulls?

7
158

A strong and sudden dose of negative G-forces causes a redout, retinal damage and blind rage, mostly online

Tragedies somehow bring out the worst in us. The Bhoja Air crash was just such an occasion. What should’ve been a time for nationwide mourning and comforting those who were struggling to come to terms with their own unbearable and unimaginable loss, was turned into a feeding frenzy for the piranhas of social media.

At around 6:40PM on Friday night, Twitter came alive with the news of an aircraft having gone down somewhere in the greater Rawalpindi area. At the time, it was raining cats and dogs outside and the sound of rolling thunder was deafening. At first, there were rumours that a chopper had gone down. I assumed that the loss of life would be minimal, as military pilots and their passengers were trained in escaping from doomed aircraft. Then, a few minutes later, it emerged that the downed aircraft may have been a passenger plane. Jolted out of my daze, I leapt to turn on the TV, hoping to catch some details in the top-of-the-hour updates. But as soon as the headline music ended and the news anchor appeared on screen, the power went out. Cursing my luck, I picked up my phone and began browsing the mobile version of the Twitter website in search of accurate information.

By the time the power came back, it had been confirmed that the maiden flight for Bhoja Air had crashed into a residential area with 127 souls on board. As the television flickered back to life, I saw my old friend, Zarghoon Shah, reporting live from what I could best describe as a scene from a war movie. Debris was strewn everywhere and a lack of adequate light meant that the cameraman was struggling very hard to keep focus on what little visuals he could muster. For the next two hours, I was glued to the screen. Occasionally, I would switch between channels, but I would always return to the Jeem as they were the ones who had the footage first. Also, I felt an affinity for the coverage, seeing as it was a familiar face that was narrating these terrible events to me. In all of these two hours, I did not see one, repeat, one corpse or even a speck of blood, so committed was the cameraman to his cause.

Soon after, I was joined by my friend and journalist Taha Siddiqui, and together we channel surfed, looking at how each channel was covering this tragedy. As was obvious, the coverage was chaotic and channels had cameras and reporters live from every place imaginable, including Bhoja Airline’s offices, the Karachi airport, the Islamabad airport and God knows where else. As we flipped channels, we speculated on what would be happening in the newsrooms of each channel at that particular point in time. The ones that were unabashedly airing shots of dismembered bodies got switched immediately. Others, where overzealous reporters were seen asking the most ludicrous questions from bereaved family members also met a similar fate.

After scrolling through the 30-odd news outlets my cable operator provides me access to, I would always end up at the Jeem, whose coverage was the most level-headed of the night. Granted, every now and then they would cut to a panicking reporter somewhere in the field who had no idea what he was saying. This, we both figured, was because in the reporter’s ear, on the talkback, was an arrogant producer, screaming and cursing at the top of his lungs. “Story, beeper, footage, updates, tickers, stand straight while you’re onscreen,” would be the mantra said producer would be hammering into the poor field reporter’s brain. And at the end of the day, the poor guy would slip, saying something insensitive, or incoherent, or even out of place. As would all the anchors that were commenting live on the incident. As would nearly all the ‘analysts’ that were called on air to pontificate.

But spare a thought for that young man, standing out there in the rain, while all around him, pandemonium reigned supreme. Blood and guts as far as the eye could see and all he was expected to do was to keep his cool and report the facts. I hate to break it to you folks, but this person was also human. The fact that he or she wasn’t in tears should be good enough for you. At least you got your fix of the latest news out of the crash site.

But was this good enough? Absolutely not. For days after the incident and even today, people are going after the media as if they are responsible for the crash. Accusations of cheap sensationalism and making money off the blood of the innocent flew around like so much pollen on the information super highway. It was a complete redout, that strong and sudden dose of negative G-forces which causes retinal damage and blind rage. Twitter-activists spewing hellfire and brimstone wanted nothing better than to burn down the headquarters of major TV channels across the country. But they also wanted to live-tweet all the information that the idiot box was spewing forth. It was madness like I’ve never seen before. Except when raging bulls come charging down. This outrage had no human face. It was the face of an animal. An animal on a bloodlust. Acting all holier-than-thou. Sickening. Just sickening.

Follow @mightyobvious on Twitter for more incoherence in 160 characters or less

7 COMMENTS

  1. In other words next time you loose a loved one in a plane crash and a reporter wants your views on the tele. Please don't feel outraged instead cooperate because they are only doing their jobs.

  2. ummm… no. what's wrong with our avid comment slinging 6-shooters these days ? I suggest you re-read and then re-comment. What Mighty was trying to do here was enlighten you about what actually goes on during a breaking news scenario. That the reporter is not always asking questions with willingness. That often the ones to blame are people (producers) sitting in the HQ MCR's, who probably have as much field experience as a yet to be born baby.

    • Fair enough but for the audience; reporters, camera man or the impatient producer in the news room are a single entity. Those who were outraged on Social Media didn't just go after the poor reporter who was merely doing his job but the anger was against "breaking news" culture which allows news channels to go to any level for viewer ratings.

      Ex: A news channel, few hours after the incident released private photos of the air hostesses (probably taken from Facebook). Similarly, a reporter was insistent to interview the brother of air crash victim despite he made several requests that he is no condition to answer anything.

      Now based on these facts if you still believe that the "raging bulls" over reacted? Than there isn't much to argue.

  3. Since I was a part of the 'animal on bloodlust' , wanted to add that I WAS a part of this media (a producer, the horror) and I did risk a lot raising objections to the kind of media coverage that happened. The fact that he or she wasn’t in tears wasn't good enough for me and wont be good enough as long as they keep exploiting other's tears. Live tweeting about a reporter asking someone inappropriate questions isnt really the same as standing in front of a bereaved husband and saying Why was she on the plane alone, why didnt you go with her. It isnt the same as Asim Rana standing in the middle of the debris saying I can show you the scene her but I can do the manzar kashi going on about what parts of body he can see strewn around. I don't want to burn anyone or anybody (am sure none of the twiteratees did) But yes, I do want the reporters to start taking responsibility – I KNOW the pressures that exist, I've dealt with them (Mostly without success) But I cant remember the last time I heard anyone in my team of reporters protesting over what he was being asked to do. Compliance with bad practices makes you a partner in crime, wouldn't you agree? – Sadaf.

  4. By the same logic, Sadaf… why wait for them to protest about it? being in the newsroom putting that story in the rundown, weren't you just as complicit as the reporter too?

Comments are closed.