We have all stood witness to the recent Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) elections which took place in all the four provinces of the country wherein Yasin Azad contested for president and won. It is worthy to note that prior to the elections which was widely covered by the print and electronic media, not many lawyers knew who Yasin Azad was. This is despite the fact that he is a sitting member of the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC). All eyes were targeted at his competitor Rasheed A Razvi, a former judge of the Sindh High Court, a hero of the Lawyers’ Movement, four-time President of the Sindh High Court Bar Association (SHCBA) and had remained vice chairman of both the PBC and Sindh Bar Council.
The unfamiliarity of Yasin’s name amongst the practicing lawyers of the nation was perhaps due to the fact that he had hardly appeared in the High Courts or the Supreme Court of Pakistan. But then how did he manage to win?
There are numerous facts cited by the supporters of Razvi which caused this colossal loss. Amongst them is the fact that the famous case of (SHCBA), reported as PLD 2009 SC 879, wherein over 90 PCO judges of the High Courts and Supreme Court were sacked. This case was spearheaded by Mr Razvi when he was the President of SHCBA. However, Mr Razvi still maintains that this was a big step towards regaining an independent judiciary and termed it as a major success. But the fact still remains that all those who were sacked stood united to oppose him in his SCBA elections.
Another major role was played by the predecessor of Azad, Ms Asma Jehangir, another lawyer with hardly any court appearance. Her only claim to fame is her active role in HRCP. Ms Jehangir, like Azad, was supported by PPP. Ms Jehangir managed to gather the same support for Azad as could be easily seen on all polling stations across the country. The Attorney General of Pakistan was working in favour of Azad at the Islamabad polling station as was Mr Shahadat Awan, the Prosecutor General at Karachi. Numerous Supreme Court lawyers received phone calls from Governor House requesting for Azad’s vote, not excluding the former Law Minister Babar Awan and Governor of Punjab Sardar Latif Khosa who played a major role in Mr Azad’s win.
A random donation of millions of rupees to the district bars, High Court Bar Peshawar, Karachi Bar Association, Punjab Bar Council and Lahore High Court Bar by the prime minister, federal law minister and then by the Punjab governor only days before the SCBA elections have also raised several questions. A country like ours which is begging for financial support from IMF and other countries to help the flood victims and to fight terrorism all of a sudden could afford to donate millions of rupees to bar associations with not more than a few hundred members. The end result was that Razvi lost by approximately 79 votes according to the un-official count.
Surprisingly, the winner from six polling stations, Azad, lost from his home city Karachi where he had practiced law all his life. The result does somewhat reflect that those who knew him well did not want him elected. It also shows that no matter which province’s turn it is to field a candidate, the decision will be taken in Lahore. Thus, the purpose of provincial representation was frustrated.
The active participation of the government in the bar elections shows how important these elections are to them and to the nation. The SCBA during the period of Qazi Anwar had repeatedly highlighted corruption in the country and had supported the decisions of the Supreme Court. Not surprisingly Asma Jehangir had deviated from this path. The bar associations and councils were instrumental in restoring the CJP and ousting a military dictator. The power of the black coat has also been felt by Zardari & Co and in order for him to keep working the way he is, it is absolutely imperative that he controls all the bars so that no one raises any important issue in public. For this the PPP is willing to invest millions of rupees in the bar elections and appoint their own puppets. Once these puppets are installed the government can rest assured that no one will shout the slogans of rule of law and independence of judiciary.
Today the job description of these puppets is simply to malign the judiciary, take their lawyer friends on expensive foreign trips, provide government cases to their friends and in return all they ask is to remain silent and keep their eyes closed.
If the bars are filled with these puppets, the day is not far when vacancies of both bar and bench are decided in the President House and in order to get any sort of relief a litigant has to first engage a PPP-approved lawyer.
The defeat of Rasheed A Razvi will soon be forgotten but it should serve as a wakeup call for all the members of the bar. Soon their survival will depend on whether they support any political party, and if so, which one?
The writer is an advocate, Supreme Court of Pakistan.
Rasheed teray jan nisaar, be shumar be shumar…
Nooruddin Ahmed
Rasheed Rizvi has outlived his utility. In fact Mr. Rizvi was not the leader of the bar.he was supported previously by the PPP and in fact he is the beneficiary of Mr.Zardari. It is incorrect to suggest that mr. yasin Azad lost from Karachi. In fact Mr Yasin won the election from Sindh.Karachi and Hyderabad combined. Mr. basin Azad is a well know. Advocate of Karachi. lawyers know him. He remained President of Karachi Bar Association for two years. He was General Secretary of Karachi Bar Association.Member of Sindh Bar Council fro at least three consecutive years. He was Vice Chairman os Sindh Bar Council. Member of Pakistan Bar Council. Member of it's enrollment committee. He played a leading role in LFO Movement when Rashid Rizvi was unheard of. perhaps the writer is prejudiced or he has deliberately showed his ignorance. Mr Rizvi and his supporters lost the recently held election os Sindh High Court Bar Association where his backed candidate Mr Ameer Raza Naqvi lost . This shows the popularity of Mr. basin Azad.
I agree with Mr. Lakhani views. Infact the writer is one of Mr. Rizvi Puppet. We all legal fraternity knows, what kind of practice they are doing only limited to Interim Relief. What Mr. Rizvi has done for the people of Bar as he was elected by them for three consecutive years as their leader? Offcourse the answer is in negative, as nothing has been done for their welfare. The legal fellowship now understood the role which Mr. Rizvi & his alliance are playing only to bestow his Kith & Kins. Yesterday hefty lost in Sindh High Court Bar Election was also tells the story as We all want change and voted for change as every Bar Counsels are running for the welfare of Lawyers rather for those who wants only to be in focus in order to increase their annual income.
This is being truly 'not-so-very-reasonable' and TYPICAL PAKISTANI!
Perhaps, a sublime reflection of your nick 🙂
Just because you disagree with the writer you are becoming a 'character assassin'.
Three times Elected bar President didnt delivered!
YOU ARE A WOMAN MATE!
Please refrain from posting such articles or comments as it goes international and gives a bad image of the judiciary and the heroes of lawyer movement, both Mr. Rizvi and Mr. Azad has played active role and good lawyers so let us live together with tolerance.
Aamir bhai, International community is not bothered about the internal politics of bar honestly speaking!
There is more to life over here then keeping an eye on the elections of Bar! …. and that sadly because of the bad policies and undue influence of the government in bar elections,.
i fully endorse the content of this article and would add that as for as character and credibility of both candidates is concerned there was no competition,MR Rizvi is hero and leader of the bar and he is a person who refused to take oath on PCO in 2000,further his leading role in historic lawyers movement in unforgettable and was the head of the executive committee of Pakistan Bar Council when decision of long march was taken,beside all this he has long history of struggle in past ,against dictatorial regimes of Zia and Ayub Whereas, mr yaseen is a person who decided against the long march during lawyers movement when he was chairman of executive committee PBC and in recent election he was being supported by the establishment,anti movement forces ,pco mafia and persons whom independant judiciary does not suit .There are many factors for the unfortunate defeat of Mr Rizvi including massive investment of govt in terms fundings of Bars ,offers of lucrative jobs and govt advisories and collection of cv s of heads of different lawyers groups especially in small stations,election meeting in governor houses etc so i think the victiory of MR Yasin as a rival of Mr Rizvi reflects the deteriorating values of the bar that has always played a leading role against the military dictatorship but in recent elections of SC Bar Association the legal fraternity has been trapped by the civilian dictatorship
Comments are closed.