- Why this lukewarm world response?
Pakistan took the burning Kashmir issue to the UN Security Council (UNSC). That the UNSC took a decision to take up the Kashmir conflict for debate in a closed-door session for the first time in the last 50 years, was very encouraging. It was a significant triumph for Pakistan, and a serious discomfiture for India which tried its best to stop this meeting.
As reported in the national and international media, the UNSC said Kashmir is a global dispute. It emphasized that it would be addressed in line with the UN Charter and UN Security Council (UNSC) resolutions in a peaceful manner. It further lucidly said that Kashmir was not an internal matter of India.
The UN Secretary General’s statement wherein he expressed grave concern over the situation in occupied Kashmir is of immense importance. He also invited reference to the Simla Accord. He also made a reference to the presence of the UN observers WHO, since long, have been reporting LoC violations.
The two nuclear powers India and Pakistan are now on a confrontational mode, which is extremely dangerous. The recent dastardly statement of the Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh that India’s policy on using nuclear weapons may change in future, depending on circumstances, and that India’s ‘No First Use’ nuclear policy may not hold for long is highly irresponsible and makes the situation more vulnerable to a catastrophic nuclear war.
Having said all that, Except China, the world’s major countries resorted to usual diplomatic parlance about the prevalent horrendous situation in Indian occupied Kashmir (IoK). China, because of its longstanding relations with Pakistan and traditionally abysmal relations with ever-belligerent India, came out vociferously on the issue and strongly supported Pakistan’s stand on Kashmir. China outspokenly said that India should avoid “unilateral actions” in Jammu and Kashmir to avoid escalation of tension in the region. Expressing its indignation, China also lucidly said that New Delhi’s decision to make Ladakh a union territory, was “unacceptable.”
In view of the foregoing scenario, it wouldn’t be inappropriate to conclude that the global reaction to the sombre Kashmir situation has largely been non-critical of India. In this context, the response of the Islamic world merits particular mention. To appreciate why has the response of the Islamic countries towards the Kashmir imbroglio been so lukewarm we would need to examine the reasons behind it. Primarily, strong economic ties of the Arab and other Islamic countries of the world with India is what compelled them to abstain from supporting Pakistan’s stand on the rapidly degenerating Kashmir situation out- and-out.
According a research report recently published in a leading national English Daily of the country, the volume of trade between India and the Muslim countries is about $100 billion. If that is true, one shouldn’t be flabbergasted at all if the response of the Arab countries, which reportedly accommodate some seven million Indian workers, has not been as vociferous on the Kashmir issue as it should have been. Contrary to India’s strong economic bond with the Islamic world, Pakistan’s total bilateral trade with the Islamic countries is considerably less. As reported, Pakistan’s total bilateral trade with the Islamic countries between 2007 and 2009 had amounted to $44.262 billion, and has not grown much since then.
Turkey’s trade volume with India rests at around $7 billion. On the contrary, Pakistan’s total bilateral trade with Turkey was barely $596.08 million for the year 2017. The bilateral trade between India and Saudi Arabia has been far greater. It is said that the Indo-Saudi bilateral trade shot up to US $27.48 billion in financial year 2017–18, from US $25.1 billion in the previous year. On the other hand, the two-way trade volume between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia is just US$ 3.6 billion, a vast difference indeed.
Pakistan’s total bilateral trade with Malaysia was just over $1.27 billion in 2017, while India’s bilateral trade with Malaysia was appreciably large. How good is Pakistan’s trade relations with neigbouring Iran can be gauged from the report of Financial Tribune (FT) published on August 26, 2019. According to FT report Trade between Pakistan and Iran is at the lowest ebb, as Pakistan’s exports alarmingly plunged to $318 million in 2015-16 from $1.32 billion in 2008-09. Pakistan’s imports from Iran stand at about $280 million, according a senior Pakistani official at Economic Affairs Division. On the contrary, Iran, which is the immediate neighboring country, has the trade volume of $18 billion with India even in the presence of US sanctions.
What makes things more disappointing for Pakistan is that the Gulf countries such as Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and Oman did not appear to have issued any statements on the crisis. The United Arab Emirates (UAE), in fact went a step further by ostensibly siding with India, terming the whole affair its internal matter. UAE’s feeble response to the Kashmir catastrophe is not without reason. The Gulf Arab states are abode to more than seven million Indian expats. They contribute significantly towards growth of the region’s economy and keep its cities swarming with all categories of workers like doctors, engineers, educators, construction workers and a variety of other laborers. Nowhere in the region is this relationship more conspicuous than in the UAE. More importantly, UAE’s trade relationship with India is also a notable factor that compelled the member Islamic countries to refrain from taking a bold stance and go out-and-out to support Pakistan. According to information published in the media, bilateral trade between India and the UAE surpassed $50 billion in 2018, thus making India the second largest trade partner of UAE.
Having taken stock of the response of the world body, the United Nations, and the countries representing the Islamic world the question that arises is: what should Pakistan then do to effectively deal with the ghastly Kashmir conundrum and win unrivalled support of the international community, including countries belonging to the Islamic world, for resolution of the Kashmir problem forthwith?
Pakistan must launch a very strong and sustained diplomatic offensive to convince the international community, the international human rights organizations, and its friends in the Islamic world that the Kashmir issue has grown out of proportion. India is ruthlessly killing innocent men, women and children in the occupied Valley. It is planning to annihilate the people of occupied Kashmir to attain its ulterior motives. The people of occupied Kashmir are being held incommunicado in total defiance of international law and rights to freedom of speech and communication. The civilized world in general and the powers that be in particular must be made to realize that time is running out fast vis-à-vis the Kashmir imbroglio. They must be made to appreciate that this grave problem has every potential to acquire devastating dimensions, if not dealt with on war footings.
The two nuclear powers India and Pakistan are now on a confrontational mode, which is extremely dangerous. The recent dastardly statement of the Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh that India’s policy on using nuclear weapons may change in future, depending on circumstances, and that India’s ‘No First Use’ nuclear policy may not hold for long is highly irresponsible and makes the situation more vulnerable to a catastrophic nuclear war. Pakistan has termed the statement as grave threat to world peace. It has cautioned the world community about the magnitude of this impending threat and urged it to take immediate cognizance of this serious state of affairs vis-à-vis Kashmir. How seriously and responsibly the world reacts to Pakistan’s concerns remains to be seen in the days and weeks to come.
