LAHORE: A petition was filed in the Lahore High Court (LHC) on Tuesday, challenging the verdict of an anti-terrorism court that allowed removal of the terrorism section from a case pertaining to the hurling of a shoe at former prime minister Nawaz Sharif at a ceremony in Jamia Naeemia in Garhi Shahu.
It stated removal of Section 7 of ATA, 1997 was against the law as the accused persons’ act of hurling a shoe at a political personality couldn’t be condoned.
On March 27, an anti-terrorism court had ordered police to remove Section 7 of Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) 1997 from the said case. The ATC judge gave this order after hearing arguments from prosecution and defence counsels.
On March 11, a man hurled a shoe at Nawaz Sharif at an event at Jamia Naeemia seminary as he took to the podium to deliver a speech.
The prime accused, Munawwar Hussain, and his friends Muhammad Sajid and Abdul Ghafoor were arrested following the incident.
A case against the three was lodged under Section-16 (Dissemination of rumours) of the Punjab Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance and Section-355 (Assault or criminal force with intent to dishonour a person, otherwise than on grave provocation) of the Pakistan Penal Code.
Later, Section 7 of the ATA was also incorporated in the First Information Report (FIR).
The accused person’s counsel argued before the court that his client hurled a shoe at Sharif out of hatred for introducing a controversial amendment to the law regarding the finality of Prophethood.
“Sharif is neither a prime minister nor a member of parliament. He, therefore, should be treated as an ordinary citizen, he added.”
Meanwhile, a prosecutor argued the crime comes within the ambit of terrorism as it created a law and order situation in addition to fear among participants of the gathering
