US says no ‘decisive’ change in Pakistan’s behaviour despite aid freeze

  • Alice Wells says Taliban must talk to Kabul, not Washington

WASHINGTON: The US has not seen a “decisive and sustained” change in the behaviour of Pakistan, even after the Trump Administration announced a $2 billion security assistance freeze to Islamabad nearly two months ago, a senior American official said on Tuesday.

”We’ve not seen decisive and sustained changes yet in Pakistan’s behaviour, but certainly we are continuing to engage with Pakistan over areas where we think they can play a helpful role in changing the calculus of the Taliban,” said Alice Wells, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Alice South and Central Asia.

Briefing reporters on the just concluded Kabul conference in Afghanistan, Wells said Pakistan has a very important role to play in the Afghan peace process.

“We believe that Pakistan can certainly help to facilitate talks and to take actions that will put pressure on and encourage the Taliban to move forward towards a politically negotiated settlement,” Wells said in response to a question.

“And our engagement with Pakistan is on how we can work together, on how we can address Pakistan’s legitimate concerns and Afghanistan’s stability through a negotiated process as well,” she said.

”Pakistani officials have underscored, they see a variety of issues, whether it’s border management or refugees or terrorism that emanates from ungoverned space in Afghanistan, as important issues, and we would agree that all of these need to be resolved during the course of a reconciliation process,” Wells said.

Pakistan has concerns over border management; over the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan’s presence in ungoverned space in Afghanistan; refugee concerns, she said.

Noting that the Afghanistan-Pakistan relationship is quite important, she said the US is supportive of the efforts to improve the bilateral relationship.

The two countries have exchanged visits over the last several months to establish a framework agreement, to enhance the bilateral relationship.

“We support that and think it’s important,” she said.

The Trump Administration, she said, believes that the intensified efforts under the South Asia strategy to put military pressure on the Taliban are important, that these military efforts help shape the conditions for talks and help to underscore that there is no military victory for the Taliban, that ultimately their legitimate grievances will have to be addressed at a negotiating table.

“We’d like to see them come to this table sooner rather than later.”


Meanwhile, Alice Wells endorsed a recent overture by the Afghan government to the Taliban as a “benchmark event” on the road to peace, but said any talks should not involve the US, something the Taliban have insisted on.

“We certainly cannot substitute for the Afghan government and the Afghan people,” said Alice Wells.

“I think it probably caught the Taliban by surprise with how thoughtful and comprehensive the package that President Ghani was putting forward,” Wells said.  “This is not a surrender that’s being offered to the Taliban.”

The Taliban haven’t formally responded to the proposal.  The group has repeatedly said it would talk only with the US, which it regards as its principal adversary and the main prosecutor of the war.

“This is, unfortunately, the byproduct of what is going to be greater success,” Wells said of the attacks, attributing them to increased pressure on the group.

“There is a point of agreement with the Taliban that there needs to be a political solution,” Wells said.  “To try to characterise the South Asia strategy as a military plan is simply wrong. There are two parts to this strategy.”


  1. If Pakistan has very important role to play than let it play that role the way it wants, it will play that role keeping in mind its national interest, not that of United states at the expanse of its own interest. Us has played most of its cards, they did not force Pakistan to abandon its national interest.

Comments are closed.