Pakistan Today

IHC adjourns Khawaja Asif Iqama case until end of winter vacations

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) adjourned plea seeking disqualification of Foreign Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif for possessing an Iqama (foreign work permit) till the end of winter vacations.

A larger bench—comprising Justice Aamer Farooq, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kiyani and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb—adjourned the petition due to non-availability of the senior lawyer of the petitioner Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s Usman Dar.

However, associate lawyer of Dar’s senior counsel appeared before the bench and submitted reply before the court.

Earlier, Khawaja Asif, through his counsel Rashdeen Nawaz submitted a reply in compliance with court orders rejecting the allegations levelled against him by the petitioner.

In his reply, the foreign minister has said that Usman Dar approached the IHC against him over the Iqama issue after he could not digest his 2013 election defeat and subsequent dismissal of his petition by the election tribunal and the Supreme Court, challenging the respondent’s victory.

Asif said the petitioner relied upon all the documents appended by him along with his nomination papers prior to the 2013 elections.

He contended that Usman Dar was trying to achieve his mala fide objectives by seeking re-adjudication of the election dispute indirectly through the filing of the current petition, which was contrary to the principle of law that “what cannot be achieved directly cannot be achieved indirectly.”

He added that Dar’s petition was bound to fail, as the conduct, motive and intention of the petitioner were mala fide, and that the petition had been filed after four years of litigation and after having exhausted all his legal rights.

The grounds chosen by the petitioner were old facts, which were available prior to the elections of 2013, and no new fact or detail had been discovered, which gave a right to a fresh cause of action to the petitioner to invoke the jurisdiction of the IHC.

Asif said the petitioner had consciously concealed the material fact that he had filed an election petition and failed till the Supreme Court.

 

Exit mobile version