Why Kashmir celebrates martyrdom

3
236

One sacrifices his or her life for the native cause

 

India’s aggression on Kashmir has always been extreme. Since 1989, when Kashmir witnessed its first armed resistance against Indian occupation, the Indian state did everything to suppress people, from killing people, arresting on suspensions to burning down markets

 

What would you call Kashmir, if not an absolute death of democracy and mockery of human rights at all levels across religious faiths, or perhaps it is a living wound — the by-product of the rage and blindness of totalitarian system that has nearly destroyed what was once synonym of paradise in poetry and literature of the world — and is rewriting itself with its own blood.

And all that a totalitarian system is capable of stimulating is martyrdom, and the most totalitarian the system becomes it is sure to face the fury of extreme martyrdom. Reading it in the newspaper and watching it on the television in the comfort and safety that secure free, social environment with opportunities provides is one thing and experiencing it firsthand every day under threat and chaos is another.

Martyr is a person who is put to death or endures great suffering on behalf of any belief, principle, or cause. In milieu like Kashmir, one sacrifices his or her life for the native cause. It is the height of patriotism. It takes tough to sacrifice all the comforts and choose to fight for a cause where you are oath to die. Frustration, unease, desolation, helplessness, depression, despair, victimhood and what, not the person living in Kashmir goes through. The present day Kashmir is nothing less than victor Frankenstein monster, with no essence, no life, and no identity left.

Kashmir is situated in the foothills of mighty Himalayas, shares its borders with three nuclear power countries — India, Pakistan, and China. It is the only Muslim-majority state which is under Indian rule. Its geopolitical situation makes it more volatile and Kashmir today is the most militarised zones in the world. As per the research conducted by Jammu Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society entitled ‘Structures of Violence’ suggest that Kashmir is the world’s highest militarised zone with the strength of the armed forces in the state roundly between 6.5 lakh (656,638) to 7.5 lakh (750,981).

India’s aggression on Kashmir has always been extreme. Since 1989, when Kashmir witnessed its first armed resistance against Indian occupation, the Indian state did everything to suppress people, from killing people, arresting on suspensions to burning down markets. There are many women’s who were subjected to rape and molestation. Today Kashmir has more than one lakh people dead since insurgency.

New Delhi never hesitates to call Kashmir to be undisputable and calls itself a sovereign state. it miserably fails to form any kind of connect with “its people” by suppressing the voice of Kashmir, seeking answers to some unpleasant questions by shooting pellets at people throwing bullets rather than addressing the elephant in the room.

Today, Kashmir celebrates martyrdom because Kashmir perhaps is trying to tell a tale untold while it wonders how does any nation, any government, justify burning down of markets in a state by army deputed for protection. How and why everyone who take such keen interest in the Kashmir issue, and seem quite keen on resolving it, play deaf and dumb to all the insufficient or incomplete investigations done by various authorities for all the heinous crimes committed by army against, men, women, and children of Kashmir. How do you justify the killing of more than one lakh people who died since insurgency?

There are thousands of people who were taken away by security forces and are never released. According to Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP), an organisation formed by the parents, whose kids were picked up by security forces, there are as many as eight thousand to 10 thousand persons whose whereabouts are missing. No jail has a trace of them. There are hundreds of women who long to meet their dear ones but the culture of impunity the government forces enjoy, it is highly unlike that the justice would be delivered.

“I am longing to see my son who was taken away by the army in 1993. I have searched him in every jail but couldn’t find traces. My struggle will end when I die,” says Parveena Ahngar, who heads APDP.

Many types of research were conducted by the department of sociology at Kashmir University from the behest of 2002 have time and again been highlighting, victimhood, depression, Post Trauma Stress Disorder and similar mental burnouts most common amongst youngsters.

Data available at the Valley’s lone psychiatric hospital at Rainawari suggest that 60 percent of patients are womenfolk who are primarily diagnosed with Post Trauma Stress Disorder. One of the factors that can’t be disassociated with Kashmir conflict is that men and women have walked shoulder to shoulder and are sharing a common grief.

While everyone talks of intolerance, and Kashmir being at the center of it, and is often ridiculed and criticised for celebrating martyrdom. I agree that there are better ways of dealing with the situation for both sides than pushing away the state further into the darkness of abandonment syndrome.

Continual cycles of violence, torture and killings have led the suffering of two generations. Any analysis will prove victimhood most common among youngsters; New Delhi’s approach towards Kashmir has always evoked alienation among Kashmiris. All the financial injection led by New Delhi has time and again failed to entertain masses. The conflict is as relevant and active now as it was during the insurgency.

Kashmir now celebrates martyrdom because the government that claims has always opted for an approach that has time and again only evoked alienation in the hearts and minds of Kashmiris. The government has failed to understand that sometimes it takes more than the subsidy, and flawed financial injections to win masses.

The intensity and magnitude of the relevancy and activeness of the recent revolt make the present situation as volatile as it was during an insurgency. While everyone feels it’s justified and bonafide for them to discuss and pass judgments about Kashmir as a state and what side it should go, no one ever seems to be discussing how abnormal, insecure and uncertain life is for people living that chaos every day for decades.

With every passing day, militancy is finding its adobe in Valley and young boys are joining different militant ranks. There are many reported incidents where teachers, college toppers, and government employees have joined militancy. What compels them to leave their career and join hands with militants? Is it mere heroism or is there any rational relevance. When one looks insight into Kashmir, every house has lost someone dear; every person is a story of suffering untold. I have never seen a rational argument taking place to find out what is compelling a young man to strap a bomb around him die a martyr leaving behind all the possibilities of a bright future that lies ahead. Would anyone in their sane mind leave it all for mere heroism or is there any rational relevance.

In spite of security forces approach, and all the atrocities what keeps the flame of hope for justice ablaze in the hearts and minds of Kashmir today is martyrdom. There has to be a cause worth it for an old father to have the strength to shoulder his young son’s coffin.

The sufferings have brought the natives to their knees. The Indian state has always adopted the justice delayed technique which has rationally many reasons. One of the foremost reasons which one understands when one looks insight is that in most of the crimes its security establishments are involved and in a country like India a judiciary can’t afford to disappoint army else the things would be no similar.

In last six months around 80 militants were killed and more and more people are joining the militant ranks and this time, those will good academic backgrounds are becoming part of it. The recent death of a young charming commander Burhan Wani has resulted in unrest in the region.

This barbaric suppression by security forces cost many their vision and many including a five-year-old boy who also became the victim. Around 30 people are reported to have lost their one good eye to India’s aggression.

In such circumstance how can one not fight a tyrant who is determined to kill irrespective of age and gender? The pictures circulated on social media platforms are enough reason for Kashmiris to fight for their indigenous cause for next 20 decades.

The recent visit of home minister Rajnath Singh is an eye opener for all those who believe that the Indian state feels for the people of Kashmir and is interested in dialog.

Soon after his visit Gowhar Geelani, a Kashmiri Journalist, wrote on his facebook wall: “India’s home minister Mr Rajnath Singh in his press conference at Srinagar’s airport refused to apologise for 50 civilian killings and injuries to over 3,000 unarmed Kashmiris at the hands of government forces, which was in a way clean chit to the trigger-happy forces,”

Any prediction regarding Kashmir would be inaccurate in the given circumstances. The situation remains as precarious as ever and any incident can induce potentially dangerous law and order equations foddering youth. The massive public unrest of 2008, 10, 13 and now 2016 are reminders of how quickly, a relatively small incident can snowball and engulf its youth populace within a matter of time.

The need of the hour is to admit that Kashmir is a disputed territory and it is high time for all the stakeholder to start a dialog. If the Kashmir issue is solved, both the nations can maintain peace and terrorism will end between the two. Military invasion can suppress the people but can’t kill the will of those who are determined to fight injustice and want freedom from chaos. Kashmir celebrates martyrdom to keep ablaze the flame so someday in the light of it maybe, maybe the administration that claims it will learn what it takes to win people.

 

Junaid Rather is a journalist based in Delhi and is currently working on his first book. 

 

3 COMMENTS

  1. The author is totally talking one sided. While I may not disagree on force used in Kashmir, I also think India being a more pacifist country has allowed limited force only and has a lot of checks and balances in Kashmir. The Kashmiris in the valley themselves have been brutal and have committed a genocide of the Pandits and ethnically cleansed over 1/2 a million pandits from the valley, So saying they are a peaceful good lot is being too hypocritical. If India were China, we would have just sent 10s of millions of Indians into the valley and just eradicated the problem like they did in Tibet through both violence and overwhelming the local population. If India were Pakistan, we would have bombed off the valley and its inhabitants like the Pakistanis are doing in Balochistan. However India being India and being pacifist is the reason we have the Kashmir problem in the first place. It was Nehrus stupidity which allowed the problem to fester else today PoK would have been ours and so would Aksai Chin.

  2. kashmir celebrates martyrdom not when you are writing but since arab muslim occopied it.kasmir is not sunni Muslim,it is a home of hindu,shia muslim,sikhs,Christ’s,bodh,ahmedi,gujjar,etc,it comprises not mearly15% of velly but gilgit baltistan,kasmir gifted to china by pakistan,pakistan occopied kashmir,jammu,and laddak as well.by calling muslim majority through systematic ethenic cleansing of hindu ptd.you will not become the sole owner of kashmir,also tell us true fact how many muslim had land before 1950.I think it zero.who gave you these properties????

  3. Each region of J&K should be offered a plebiscite. Jammu and Ladakh will surely join India as integral parts. If Kashmiris want to leave India for Pakistan or Independence, they should be allowed to do so. We get nothing from an autonomous Kashmir but are forced to spend billions in defending them from Pakistan and in various financial packages to win "hearts and minds" of Kashmiris. It is totally stupid. We should either do to Kashmir what China did to Tibet (kill autonomy, change demography and rule with an iron fist) or go the democratic way (my preferred option) and offer them a plebiscite. Colonials powers loot colonies. Democracies do not rule anyone against their wishes. Only fools use pellet guns to rule a hostile populance and then given them billions of our money to win over their hearts. As they say in Hindi: Na maya na Ram. India's Kashmir policy is idiotic. It is neither profitable to India nor virtuous.

Comments are closed.