Students from a Gujarat school could not tell the difference between a triangle from a circle but received 90 per cent marks in their board exams.
The incident is a possible embarrassment to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s flaunted Gujarat model of development.
“They could not tell a triangle from a circle. One of them said a triangle has four sides and another student could not point out set two integers on a line bar, while many of them failed to solve two-digit multiplication and subtraction,” the Indian Express said about a test given to Class X students because they were believed to have cheated.
Some appeared honest and wrote, “avadtu nathi” (do not know) on their answer sheets.
All the 500 Class X students, who gave the answers to basic questions during a hearing session on Tuesday on suspected cases of copying at the Gujarat board headquarters in Gandhinagar, had scored more than 80 per cent marks.
A few even scored 90-95 per cent in the objective section (50 per cent of the total marks) of their mathematics paper in the board exams, results of which were announced on May 24. Also, all these students scored zero in the subjective section.
At the hearing, according to officials, the students revealed a teacher used to stand right below the CCTV camera of the examination hall and tutored them answers. Some of them said they used to hear “voices from outside the window” of the classroom. Parents or guardians of the students were also at the hearing.
“What caught the attention of the examiners during tallying of marks was the disparity between marks for their objective and subjective answers, particularly in mathematics. Nothing untoward was noticed even when the CCTV footage of certain sensitive examination centres were scanned,” said Officer on Special Duty M. A. Pathan, who led the jury of five board members.
The 500 students whose results have been withheld were from three examination centres at Lambadiya (Sabarkantha), Choila (Aravalli) and Bhikapur (Chhota Udepur).
Also, all of them were from secondary grant-in-aid schools that reflected “improved” results when compared to last year’s performance, the Express said. Improvement in results made these schools eligible for a proportionately higher grant.
During the hearing, students in the presence of their parents denied any wrongdoing and claimed they had forgotten all the answers in three months since the board exam in March.
After warning the parents against “setting a bad example”, the panel assured that students telling the truth would be supported.
The move worked and a few admitted in their response sheets that they were helped by “someone from outside the examination room through the windows”, a jury member said.
Is the grading system to be blamed ?
Comments are closed.