Islamic State is no weaker than a year ago

1
244

After billions of dollars spent and more than 10,000 extremist fighters killed, Daesh or the self-styled Islamic State (IS) group is fundamentally no weaker than it was when the United States led bombing campaign began a year ago, American intelligence agencies have concluded.
The military campaign has prevented Iraq’s collapse and put IS under increasing pressure in northern Syria, particularly squeezing its self-proclaimed capital in Raqqa.
But intelligence analysts see the overall situation as a strategic stalemate: IS remains a well-funded extremist army able to replenish its ranks with foreign jihadis as quickly as the US can eliminate them.
Meanwhile, the group has expanded to other countries, including Libya, Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula and Afghanistan.
The assessments by the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defence Intelligence Agency and others appear to contradict the optimistic line taken by the Obama administration’s special envoy, retired General John Allen, who told a forum in Aspen, Colorado, last week that “ISIS is losing” in Iraq and Syria.
The intelligence was described by officials who would not be named because they were not authorised to discuss it publicly.
“We’ve seen no meaningful degradation in their numbers,” a defence official said, citing intelligence estimates that put the group’s total strength at between 20,000 and 30,000 ─ the same estimate as last August when the airstrikes began.
The Islamic State’s staying power also raises questions about the administration’s approach to the threat that the group poses to the US and its allies.
Although officials do not believe it is planning complex attacks on the West from its territory, the group’s call to Western Muslims to kill at home has become a serious problem, Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey and other officials say.
Yet under the Obama administration’s campaign of bombing and training, which prohibits American troops from accompanying fighters into combat or directing air strikes from the ground, it could take a decade to drive the Islamic State from its safe havens, analysts say.
The administration is adamant that it will commit no US ground troops to the fight despite calls from some in Congress to do so.
The US-led coalition and its Syrian and Kurdish allies on the ground have made some inroads.
The Islamic State has lost 9.4 per cent of its territory in the first six months of 2015, according to an analysis by the conflict monitoring group IHS.
And the military campaign has arrested the sense of momentum and inevitability created by the group’s stunning advances last year, leaving the combination of Sunni religious extremists and former Saddam Hussein loyalists unable to grow its forces or continue its surge.
“In Raqqa, they are being slowly strangled,” said an activist who fled Raqqa earlier this year and spoke on condition of anonymity to protect relatives and friends who remain there.
“There is no longer a feeling that Raqqa is a safe haven for the group.”
A Delta Force raid in Syria that killed Islamic State financier Abu Sayyaf in May also has resulted in a well of intelligence about the group’s structure and finances, US officials say.
His wife, held in Iraq, has been cooperating with interrogators. Syrian Kurdish fighters and their allies have wrested most of the northern Syria border from the Islamic State group.
In June, the US-backed alliance captured the border town of Tal Abyad, which for more than a year had been the militants’ most vital direct supply route from Turkey.
The Kurds also took the town of Ein Issa, a hub for IS movements and supply lines only 35 miles (56 kilometers) north of Raqqa.
As a result, the militants have had to take a more circuitous smuggling path through a stretch of about 60 miles (96 kilometers) they still control along the Turkish border.
A plan announced this week for a US-Turkish “safe zone” envisages driving the Islamic State group out of those areas as well, using Syrian rebels backed by airstrikes.
In Raqqa, US coalition bombs pound the group’s positions and target its leaders with increasing regularity.
The militants’ movements have been hampered by strikes against bridges, and some fighters are sending their families away to safer ground.
In early July, a wave of strikes in 24 hours destroyed 18 overpasses and a number of roads used by the group in and around Raqqa.
Reflecting IS unease, the group has taken exceptional measures against residents of Raqqa the past two weeks, activists say.
It has moved to shut down private Internet access for residents, arrested suspected spies and set up security cameras in the streets. Patrols by its “morals police” have decreased because fighters are needed on the front lines, the activists say.
But American intelligence officials and other experts say that in the big picture, the Islamic State is hanging tough.
In Iraq, the Islamic State’s seizure of the strategically important provincial capital of Ramadi has so far stood.
Although US officials have said it is crucial that the government in Baghdad win back disaffected Sunnis, there is little sign of that happening. American-led efforts to train Syrian rebels to fight the Islamic State have produced a grand total of 60 vetted fighters.
The group has adjusted its tactics to thwart a US bombing campaign that tries to avoid civilian casualties, officials say.
Fighters no longer move around in easily targeted armored columns; they embed themselves among women and children, and they communicate through couriers to thwart eavesdropping and geolocation, the defense official said.
Oil continues to be a major revenue source. By one estimate, the Islamic State is clearing $500 million per year from oil sales, said Daniel Glaser, assistant secretary for terrorist financing at the Treasury Department.
That’s on top of as much as $1 billion in cash the group seized from banks in its territory.

1 COMMENT

  1. Sources, that this publisher fails to represent, typically refer to the terrorist group as "ISIS", "ISIL" or "daesh" and this includes content from a wide range of Muslim sources, a great many interviewed experts and a wide range of governmental and non-governmental agencies. Even in this video the children make repeated references to daesh (the direct Arabic equivalent of ISIS or ISIL) but this is disregarded. This publisher typically at least has the decency to present "Islamic State group".

    Among the more representational and reporting based oultlets are http://edition.cnn.com/ ; http://www.nytimes.com/ and http://www.independent.co.uk/ which can alternately be accessed, also accessed by: https://www.youtube.com/user/CNN and https://www.youtube.com/user/TheNewYorkTimes .

    Perhaps inadvertently or perhaps just due to the sheer carelessly of this agency advocates the self designation of a terror group that is very far from being representative of Islam, that bombs mosques among its other atrocities and which is not a state.

Comments are closed.