Senate determined to dig into ex-CJPs privileges

2
212
  • Senators summon AGP to seek details of perks and privileges of former chief justice Chaudhry

 

The Senate of Pakistan has expressed its resolve to know every single detail of the perks and privileges given to retired chief justices of the country, and summoned the attorney general to appear before it and explain the situation.

Senate Chairman Syed Nayyar Hussain Bukhari took the decision after Minister for Law and Justice Pervaiz Rashid informed the House that “the Supreme Court has not responded to six letters of the ministry” over the subject.

Attorney General Salman Akram Butt is expected to attend the Senate proceedings today (Wednesday).

Though the SC has yet to disclose information, the minister is said to have learnt “verbally” that former chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry is driving a 6,000cc bulletproof Mercedes Benz (GD-0341 of the Cabinet Division) in pursuance to a judgment of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in January 2014, and the Law Ministry was bearing the fuel and maintenance cost.

In response to a question of PPP Senator Saeed Ghani, the minister said that since January 30, 2014, as much as 4,689 litres of petrol has been issued to the former CJP’s car, while a repair estimate of Rs 3,375,029 has been presented to the Law Division for which funds through a special grant are required from the Finance Division. He said an intra-court appeal (ICA) has been filed, but despite applications of an early hearing, it is still pending.

The reply ignited a debate in the House with members showing concern over the SC’s reluctance to share information and some raising doubts over the superiority of Parliament.

During the course of the discussion, Bokhari referred to Article 205 [fifth schedule] of the Constitution, regarding remuneration of judges, and questioned whether rules have been amended to provide a bulletproof car to the former CJP.

“We have not asked anything secret. The Constitution allows us to have this information. Is the SC Registrar not bound to provide relevant information to the House?” asked Senator Ghani. Further, Senator Zahid Khan questioned whether the Supreme Court is above Parliament.

Afterwards, the chairman asked Leader of the Opposition in the Upper House Aitzaz Ahsan and Senators Rafiq Rajwana and Babar Awan to assist the House over the issue when the AG appears before the members. However, the law minister said the government would agree with whatever decision is taken by the Senate.

According to details, the number of retired CJPs since 1985 is 12. The CJP, on his retirement, is entitled to the minimum amount of the pension, equal to 70% of the salary determined by the president from time to time, plus, 5% for each completed year of service either as the CJP, or as a judge — not exceeding the minimum amount of pension equal to 85% of the said salary.

The CJP is also entitled to a driver and an orderly; 3,000 free local calls per month; 2,000 units of electricity; 25 hm gas per month and a free supply of water. In terms of vehicles, they are also entitled to 300 litres of petrol per month; purchase of official vehicle of 1,800cc at depreciated value, while no income tax shall be payable in respect of benefits and perquisites to which a judge or a widow as the case may be, is entitled.

Later during the Senate session, a joint opposition staged another walkout from the proceeding to protest against changes in the Pak-China economic corridor route. But Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Sheikh Aftab Ahmed asked the deputy chairman to adjourn the proceedings, contrary to parliamentary norms, instead of bringing back the opposition in the House.

2 COMMENTS

  1. All the privileges should have been withdrawn soon as he resigned, how does one expect any justice from judges with this kind of mentality.

    • An Afro-American friend of mine was blasting his family when I visited him. On my arrival I enquired the reason of his rage,. Listen his argument about his son's buying A hot for $50.00 . I said this is quite normal price for a hat. He said that he agree with my me but disagree to allow this boy to spend that much amount for a $5.00 worth of head. This argument is quite fitting on Chaudhry Iftkhar. He is not reasonably honest man and is a Super Parasite like all Others. Where is sanity and individual honesty. YES! Greed has no limits. CHAUDHRY JI! SHOW SOME CHARACTER PLEASE.

Comments are closed.