The battle between dog and cat owners has taken a new turn.
A survey of 500 U.S adults has discovered that ‘dog people’ are typically more dominant and comfortable with social hierarchy, than their cat-loving counterparts.
It also suggests canine owners are more likely to accept social inequality between social groups, too.
The study, carried out by the University of Melbourne, made these conclusions because dog lovers were found to be more competitive than cat lovers, and scored higher on ‘social dominance orientation,’ (SDO) in surveys.
This personality trait is linked with group-based discrimination, and people who score higher on the scale are more likely to ‘expect, accept and endorse social inequality’.
Nick Haslam, Professor of Psychology at University of Melbourne surveyed over 500 adults to examine individuals’ dominance-related personality traits.
In both surveys, which are to be published in the journal Anthrozoos, dog lovers scored higher for SDO.
Interestingly, women scored lower than men and were more likely to be cat lovers, but dog people were typically more dominant.
Researchers think that those scoring higher in the SDO trait prefer dogs to cats because they are more comfortable with hierarchical relationships, and can order their dog around.
A recent study by psychology experts at Ghent University, Belgium and Brock University in Ontario, found people who are more dominant have a tendency to believe humans are superior to animals, and therefore more likely to accept animal exploitation.
This may fit in with a stereotypical view of man’s relationship with his best friend, as while dogs are perceived as being loyal, they are also easily trained and manipulated unlike more independent or fickle cats.