CJP says God’s name being used to evade justice

2
125

 

Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry on Friday said pardoning someone convicted of murder by a court of law in the name of God was tantamount to evading the law.

The chief justice’s remarks came days after the parents and two sisters of Shahzeb Khan, who was murdered in cold blood by a business tycoon’s son and his three accomplices, approached the Sindh High Court to seek acquittal of the convicts after pardoning them “in the name of Allah”.

The pardon of the men convicted of Shahzeb’s murder triggered a widespread debate over whether the country’s elite could be held accountable for crimes they committed, as the prime accused belonged to a powerful feudal family.

Chief Justice Iftikhar was speaking on the matter during the hearing of another murder case.

The chief justice stated that it was wrong to use Quranic verses and religion for personal gains.

He said most suffering individuals and families were usually pressured into pardoning the convict, adding that it was the responsibility of the court(s) to prevent acts that harmed not only certain people and families, but society at large.

The CJP declared that if an agreement between the parties failed to bring peace to either of the two, it could not be regarded as such.

“The agreement between the parties has to be valid for a court of law to allow the pardon for the convict(s)”.

The chief justice asked Attornery General Munir A Malik, all four provincial prosecutor generals and Advocate Shahid Hamid, who is representing a party in the case heard today, for their opinions on the issue relating to pardon in murder cases by September 23.c

2 COMMENTS

  1. When a judgement is passed by the highest court in Pakistan why to bring the name of God to seek pardon? Orders issued got to be obeyed to show that justice is for all No one is above the law

  2. This is most pathetic; bringing in Quaranic verses to evade justice is an abominable act and must be condemned forcefully and with full vigour of morality. This is simply unacceptable.

    A Reader also writes as James Baxter.

Comments are closed.