Information Minister Qamar Zaman Kaira has said that the government does not feel any necessity to go to ‘Sharif Coutrs’.
Talking to journalists outside the Parliament here on Monday, he said that PPP had buried the politics of 90s. Now neither it would itself move towards it nor allow anyone to dig its grave, he added.
“I ask Nawaz Sharif that why they are making hue and cry. Is there only his party who knows the law? All other parties have been waiting for the detailed decision of the court. We did not deny to accept court orders”, Kaira added.
He said the court was saying that PM had a right to appeal, but Nawaz Sharif was trying to snatch PM’s due right. People remembered that Nawaz Sharif ran away from the court in Mehran Bank scandal case, he said further adding that his advisors were impious. Chaudhary Nisar is a swindler who thinks himself the wisest man on earth, he said.
Nisar said that Aitzaz Ahsan gave arguments in the court, but court did not agree with him and it makes no difference. The court also declared Nawaz Sharif prime culprit in the plane hijack case, but after nine years, he went into appeal and the court cleared him of the charges.
He need a sarya (Iron Rod) shoved into him from the back
All Pakistanis must appreciate the level of discourse amongst its leaders and ought to be proud of them.
All the people commenting here are corrupt Punjabi elite and corruption ridden upper middle class MAFIA who hate every PM or President who is racially non-Punjabi. Remember I am Punjabi too but like ordinary Punjabi I dont belong to this Mafia .
Correction! Not every person commenting here is punjabi or from upper middle class. You can tell their background and level of education by the comments they make or their (proper) use of english. Some of us are from upper class 🙂
Getting back to the point. What does nawaz's corruption has to do with gillani's corruption? Because nawaz was corrupt, does that give gillani the right to be corrupt also? The logic kaira is using makes no sense. gillani was found guilty and he will stay guilty untill (and if) the court overturns its decision. If we go by his reasoning then that means that every murderer can claim to be innocent even after they are found guilty as long as they plan on appealing the verdict. Should a convicted murderer be out on the streets because he is appealing the verdict? I think not.
Comments are closed.