In a bid to save CIA’s drone campaign against al Qaeda in Pakistan, US officials offered key concessions to Pakistan’s spy chief that included advance notice and limits on the types of targets. But the offers were flatly rejected, leaving US-Pakistani relations strained. CIA Director David Petraeus, who met Pakistan’s then-spy chief Lt Gen Ahmed Shuja Pasha at a meeting in London in January, offered to give Pakistan advance notice of future CIA drone strikes against targets on its territory in a bid to keep Pakistan from blocking the strikes – arguably one of the most potent US tools against al Qaeda.
The CIA chief also offered to apply new limits on the types of targets hit, said a senior US intelligence official briefed on the meetings. Pasha said then what Pakistani officials and its parliament have repeated in recent days: that Pakistan will no longer brook independent US action on its territory by CIA drones, two Pakistani officials said. All the officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive negotiations. Pasha went further, saying Pakistan’s intelligence service would no longer carry out joint raids with US counterterrorism teams inside its country, as it had in the past. Instead, Pakistan would demand that the US hand over the intelligence, so its forces could pursue targets on their own in urban areas, or send the Pakistani army or jets to attack the targets in the Tribal Areas, explained a senior Pakistani official. Pasha’s pronouncements were in line with the Pakistani parliament’s demands issued last week that included ceasing all US drone strikes as part of what Pakistani politicians call a “total reset” in its relationship. Other US officials said no such concessions were offered to Pasha, and insisted US counterterrorism actions continued as before.
This news portrays a picture as if after refusal of Pasha, the Americans stopped the drone attacks.
Pakistan must make it clear that Afghan or Arab airbases hosting drones will be hit. Time to play games is over. We must cultivate bases in Mexico ans Syria as well.
Game over would be when you attack U.S. interest in afghanistan. Mexico's not gonna sever ties with the U.S. and let you build a base you could not possably defend.
Comments are closed.