National security vs welfare state
Should the priority and focus of the state be national security or the security and welfare of the people who live in it? This is an issue, which is being debated particularly in Pakistan and in other South Asian countries.
I belong to the school of thought which believes that social welfare should not be compromised by national security considerations. No doubt, territorial integrity and stability within the states and from inter-state conflicts must be secured, but the paramount consideration ought to be the social welfare of the people. If social welfare is not secured then the people tend to secure their economic interest in other countries.
Regrettably, in India and Pakistan our budget allocation priorities have remained riveted on defence sector. If we cannot afford to make such huge allocations for the defense, we readily indulge in borrowings in billions of dollars, which makes our future generations also heavily indebted. This obviously results in neglect of the social sector. These arguments constitute simple common sense but unfortunately certain vested interests and the establishments of our countries, which thrive on promotion of hatred and conflicts, reject such simple logic and reasoning.
The prudent and advisable policies to secure both national security and social welfare of the people, is to strike warm, cordial relations and cooperation in all sphere, with our neighboring countries, rather than placing reliance on distantly located USA or the western block. China, in my opinion, appears to be more trustworthy neighbour to secure not only defence but also equitable economic developments.
Last year in July a conference was held in China to discuss ways and means to promote collaboration between China and SAARC through enhanced people to people exchanges. It is obvious from the very decision to hold this Conference in China that both the government and its think tanks are equally desirous of promoting more close and cordial relations with the SAARC countries. Greater cooperation and closer ties of the SAARC countries with China, in my opinion would not only serve our national security concerns but also enable us to give greater priority and allocation to the social sector, which is the craving need of the oppressed people of the entire South Asia region.
It is very heartening to note that in the post-Cold War era, both Congress and BJP of India have wisely pursued a consistent policy of reconciliation and engagement with China. The past prime ministers of these parties and other leaders of India have repeatedly expressed that “India had no wish to hold China as an enemy or a threat”. They reinforced the desire to establish friendly relations with China. At no point has the diplomatic engagement between India and China ceased. Even the 1998 nuclear tests by India did not cause any harm to India’s policy and relations with China. To my knowledge, India has also succeeded in making some of the territorial adjustments with China. Lately, the economic ties between India and China have attained new heights, perhaps China is the biggest trading partner of India.
On the other hand, China is the most trusted ally and strategic partner of Pakistan for close to five decades. China, being the common denominator between India and Pakistan, is well placed to play a significant role in promoting cordial relations, peace and progress not only between our three countries but also in the entire South Asia region. China’s high profile in the economic interactions at both bilateral and regional levels has most favourable implications for the region as a whole.
It is necessary to highlight a most portent threat to our security, that of terrorism. It is not only destroying peace and security of both India and Pakistan, but also harming trust and confidence between the two. Those terrorists, who were involved in one of the worst tragedies of 26/11 in Mumbai, or in the terrorist attack on Parliament in Delhi on 13th December 2001 or in the commission of the same barbaric acts of terrorism every other week in all nooks and corners of Pakistan, are enemies of Pakistan and equally of India. Pakistan in particular, is the worst victim of religious extremist terrorist organisations. According to unofficial sources since 2002, more than 7,000 members of our military and paramilitary forces and police have sacrificed their precious lives in confronting these terrorists while more than 70,000 innocent citizens in various part of our country have died in innumerable attacks by the terrorists during the same period.
The imperatives of the foreign policy of both India and Pakistan must be focused on the principles of peaceful coexistence and economic collaboration and to put an end to the blame game strategy and the hate propaganda by state or non-state elements against each other.
I am mindful of the fact that the issue of Kashmir is a serious bone of contention between India and Pakistan. However, this dispute should not be allowed to prevent, forever cordial relations between our two countries. I have been urging and pleading for over a decade that one of the viable, realistic and pragmatic solutions for resolving the Kashmir dispute, at least for the time being and without prejudice to the respective stand of the two countries on Kashmir, is to de-facto accept the line of control with some adjustment as the international border.
In my view, this is also the spirit and objective of the Shimla Agreement of 1972. The aforesaid acknowledgement must, however, be followed by a treaty between India and Pakistan containing firm and sincere commitments a) That both the countries must discourage and prevent aggressive actions, militancy or terrorism or policy of blame game against each other; and b) Border between the two countries and between the two Kashmirs should be opened to the people at large with free access, free trade, exchange of cultural activities, academics, intellectual groups, sports events, free access to the electronic and print media etc.
I would also like to highlight the incalculable dividends that we can draw by establishment of peace, harmony, open borders, environment of trust, cooperation and collaboration between the SAARC countries and with China will usher a new era of prosperity and peace.
The writer is a senior advocate of the Supreme Court, a former Senator, Attorney General and Federal Minister. He may be contacted at [email protected]
To create a welfare state a number of steps would be required, it is not simply the balance of social sector budget & military spending.
First & foremost is the leadership crisis, implementation of true democracy
PART-I. On the face of it, the writer has given some positive suggestions. But in between, he has inserted certain points which have already been seen as dangerous portents for Pakistan and in turn for India.Writer says: (1) China, in my opinion, appears to be more trustworthy neighbour to secure not only defence but also equitable economic developments. (2) "………China, being the common denominator between India and Pakistan………". (3) "……………..China, in my opinion would not only serve our national security concerns…………..". (4) "Those terrorists, who were involved in one Haviof the worst tragedies of 26/11 in Mumbai, or in the terrorist attack on Parliament in Delhi on 13th December 2001 or in the commission of the same barbaric acts of terrorism every other week in all nooks and corners of Pakistan, are enemies of Pakistan and equally of India." (my answer read part II).
PART II—1. Until China and Pakistan withdraw their territorial claims on India territory, India can not take China to be trustworthy and how much trustworthy is Pakistan, the whole world knows it. 2. Details are not necessary here, China, having serious claims on Indian territory and helping Pakistan to strengthen its enimity towards India in every way and also having its army boots in POK, can not be a common denominator between India and Pakistan. 3. If China can serve Pakistan's security concerns, then, what for has this article been written for?
PART III– 4. The stand taken by Pak Govt. and Pak Army and ISI that Pak is also suffering from terrorism like India.This is a deceitful stand. Now, this writer says that those terrorists who attacked Indian Parliament and Mumbai 26/11 are same who are attacking in Pakistan. Nothing can be more deceitful writing and suggestion. Those who attacked in India are, Pak-army, ISI, JuD, Let and JeM and none of these 'Assets' are involved in attacks within Pakistan. Whom is the writer trying to befool? Until this writer comes clean, his suggestins will be taken as paid, deceitful and misleading.
Having said all that, I agree that if India and Pakistan can come togather in the interest of common people of the sub-continent, the benefits will be enormous.
The writer suffers from a malady which has been the bane of Pakistan from the day of its birth. He is keen to find a way out of the hole he finds Pakistan in, but feels ashamed of accepting the apparent nakedness. By way of a fig leaf he attempts to show India as well in similar nakedness. Surprisingly, he seems oblivious of the danger of being exposed.
The comments by S. Lal above should be enough for the writer to wake up and smell coffee.
Publishing such a piece reflects poorly on Pakistan Today.
The concept of national security created and promoted a radical ideology in the society, but now people are distancing themselves from this concept and want a welfare state.
EU will be handing Pakistan 10 robots and 10 equipped vehicles that would help the bomb disposing squads in spotting the improvised explosive devices.
we can only identify the use of IEDs. why not our government and security agencies taking step to stop the production and use of improvised explosive devices.
Improvised explosive devices are the terrorist’s main weapon and efforts needs to be done to stop its production.
Improvised explosive devices are dangerous because they cannot be detected.
EU will be providing Pakistan with the latest robot system which would help the bomb disposal squads in spotting the improvised explosive devices, that terrorists use to spread violence.
Good move by the EU to provide 10 robots and 10 equipped vehicles to Pakistan. It will definitely help the security agencies in controlling the terrorists attack, powered by improvised explosive devices.
Comments are closed.