The ‘boss’ wanted to pre-empt ‘bad boys’: Ijaz

6
153

The memo scandal’s lead witness Mansoor Ijaz continued recording his testimony on Thursday, with startling claims about how Hussain Haqqani, the former Pakistani ambassador to the US, okayed the memo’s final draft after securing approval from the “boss” (President Asif Ali Zardari) to seek American pressure for restricting “bad boys” – the chiefs of Pakistan Army and the ISI – from launching a feared coup.
“After repeated confirmations that ambassador Haqqani has obtained approval from the ‘boss’, and it was after his go-ahead signal that I forwarded the final draft of the memorandum to General James Jones at 1:28am on May 10, 2011, who forwarded the same to Mike Mullen on the very next day followed by a phone call either from the US president or Mike Mullen himself to ‘Pindi’,” Ijaz told the memo commission via video link from the Pakistani High Commission in London.
The Pakistani-American businessman continued from where he had left on Wednesday, the first day of recording his statement, and presented more documents to the judicial commission in support of his claim that he drafted and delivered the memo to the top US officials on the advice of former ambassador to the US Hussain Haqqani.
“On May 10, 2011, around 9am, I called Haqqani at the Inter-Continental Hotel in London, and told that the message had been sent to the US interlocutor and also discussed the contents of the memo. I enquired from him whether he had obtained the approval (from the “boss”) and he responded: he has boss’s approval and gave me a go-ahead, by which he meant the delivery of the memo to James Jones. At that time, it might be the assumption of Haqqani that Jones would be the interlocutor. It is possible that Haqqani assumed that I would choose James Jones as interlocutor,” he told the enquiry tribunal from London.
“On May 11, I received a message from Jones that Mansoor message delivered,” Ijaz claimed. He further said that Haqqani wanted the memo delivered to Mullen ahead of a scheduled meeting between the former US military chief and some Pakistani officials.
Ijaz said he had sent the first draft of the memorandum to Haqqani on May 9. “I made a four minutes call to Haqqani to inform him that the memo had been drafted. After sending a copy of the draft memo to Haqqani, I called James Jones. I informed him that I have conveyed Haqqani that the message has to be in writing and has the requisite authority of the highest authority in Pakistan,” he said, adding that he had sent a message to Haqqani stating that the message would be delivered to Mullen. “Three minutes later, Haqqani confirmed receiving the draft of the memo. However, he informed that he was tweaking it. He told me that once one objective (delivery of the message) was achieved, then Haqqani would get explicit approval on the specifications of the operation to get the army down”, he added.
Ijaz claimed that until that time President Zardari was not aware of how Haqqani would get the army down, and had general instructions to get the military chief back. He said that on May 10, he called Haqqani and informed him that three possible persons could deliver the message to Mullen. “Two have already backed out, as they wanted the letter on a letterhead and signed by President Zardari, and these two options have been excluded,” he recalled as having told Haqqani. “The third one has agreed provided that it (the memo) had the authority of the president of Pakistan, to which Haqqani stated that he had sorted it out with the boss,” Ijaz claimed as having told Haqqani. “Immediately after I called James Jones I informed him that the message would be in writing and he (Haqqani) would get approval during the night. Haqqani again told me that he had sorted out with the boss, however, I spoke to James Jones and told him that authority would be solidified and made explicit during the night. The conversation with James Jones concluded that I would be sending the memo within the next hour, but he would not forward the email to Mike Mullen as Haqqani is tweaking the memo. At 1:28am on May 10, I sent the final draft to James Jones from my email address in two files – one Word file and the other PDF file,” Ijaz submitted before the commission. He also produced a copy of the email sent to Jones. He said that point six, which related to the US access to the widows of Osama bin Laden, was taken out from what turned out to be the final draft of the memorandum. On May 10, I sent a copy of the memo to James Jones. “In this email, I denoted Haqqani as ‘Baba’,” he further told the commission. Ijaz said the identity of James Jones was kept hidden in the email sent to Haqqani which contained the memo. “I did not want Haqqani to know who was helping me,” Ijaz added.
“I wanted to protect the identity of James Jones, and in my email, in which I forwarded the memo to Haqqani, I removed the address of Jones and instead inserted something else as secrecy. In addition, I made certain other modifications to the body text of the email to ensure that nothing could be traced back to Jones,” he added.
Continuing with his testimony, Ijaz said that James Jones was sceptical and surprised if anyone in Pakistan government could talk the matters mentioned in the memo. He said that on May 12, Haqqani informed him about the meeting between Mullen and Pakistani officials, and that a phone call could go out from the US president or Mike Mullen to “Pindi”. On communication with the Blackberry manufacturer, Research in Motion, for obtaining the record of the communication between him and Haqqani during a specific time period, Ijaz told the commission that he was unable to obtain the data. He said that he had already sent 12 emails to the commission which contained all the requests by him or his lawyer to the RIM for obtaining the data.
Haqqani’s lawyer Zahid Bukhari continued irritating the commission as well as Ijaz with his “unnecessary objections” to the proceedings. At one point, Ijaz got provoked when Bukhari objected to the proposal of Akram Sheikh that Ijaz should make a final request to the RIM to release the data. “I waived my privacy rights but Haqqani did not. Let the commission know on which grounds RIM declined the request. We tried in search of truth and he (Haqqani) has no interest in finding the truth,” Ijaz shouted, saying that after RIM’s refusal to release the data, the entire truth was in his Blackberry sets.
Ijaz told the commission that many messages were exchanged between him and Haqqani which he could send to the commission through email.
He explained that the term “bad boys” in the messages referred to the chiefs of Pakistan Army and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). He said that Haqqani had messaged that the US could get access to Osama bin Laden’s widows.
To Bukhari’s questions raised a day earlier about Ijaz’s faith, the Pakistani-American businessman categorically stated: “I am a Muslim.” He also recited the initial part of the first “Kalima” testifying Allah’s oneness to make Haqqani’s lawyer believe that he was a Muslim. However, Justice Isa asked him to keep his cool, as the opponent might provoke him to break his chain of thoughts. Upon an objection raised by the attorney general, the commission observed that the Blackberry record would not be exhibited at that particular juncture. The AG was of the view that the electronic evidence was subject to security certification under Article 78-A of Qanoon-e-Shahadat. The commission directed the commission’s secretary to take prints of the electronic communication directly from Ijaz’s laptop computer. Mansoor Ijaz has almost finished his testimony, and the commission would continue its proceedings today.

6 COMMENTS

  1. IT has really become a comedy of sorts. When push came to shuv nothing came out of all this.Mr ijaz mansoor could not get security in Pakistan, mr Haqqani lost his blackberry and forgot the pincode. A sign of presnile dementia.? The ISI chief had a nice tour of uk at taxpayers expense.Now mr ijaz is entertaining us by videolink. What legitimacy does it have.? We are making a fool of ourselves on the world stage. I cannot recall a situation where the men in khakhi have been portrayed in such a way. Miss Veena Mallik must be feeling vindicated.Shakespear was right about playing roles on the stage and disappearing.When will you disappear mr Ijaz. When will you make a statement Gen Kayani.?Silence sometimes is not golden!

    • Dr Khan it is a pathetic comment. Your lack of understanding of the matter and invocation of inquiry leading to framing of charges is evident from what you have written. Yesterday and Observer from UK made similar comments. I am reproducing here what I said in response to what the Observer had to say;

      "Observer from UK is right; it is unthinkable here in the UK but his comments are very light and fall below the robustness required to withstand common logic.

      Queen of England, Queen Elizabeth II or David Cameron the PM are not going to ask President Zardari's or PM Gillani's assistance to remove General Sir Peter Wall the new Chief of General Staff of British Army who has taken over from General Sir David Richards. In case such a need arises they will make an in-house decision. They will also not allow access to any of their state secrets.

      The politicians in Pakistan need to go through this maturation process. Nawaz Sharif when in power sent Shahbaz Sharif to see President Clinton with almost similar request.

      Let's face Imran Khan also gave a very cavalier statement about the Army and the ISI before an Indian journalist.

      What needs to be learnt here is that Pakistani politicians need to be confident and bear Pakistan's and not their own best interest in mind when making appointments to key positions. Unfortunately they take pride in appointing Patwaries and SHOs.

      Only a judicial process has some hope of bringing about a change in this very unsatisfactory and highly objectionable practice."
      http://www.pakistantoday.mbt.pk/2012/02/memo-comm

      Dr M Ahmad
      UK

  2. Kiyani and Pasha were pretty much done with case by changing the ambassidor, but Nawaz wants to do the point scoring. Now we had already spent alot time on it, let see it till end and hope so its better for Pakistan. Peace.

  3. Mansoor Ijaz is speaking the truth. The game plan was to remove Gen Kiyani and Pasha and give free hands to American to take over pakistan

    The unrest in Baluchistan is sponsored and supported by America, India, Israel, Afghanisation and UAE. Bases in Baluchistan and Sindh were offered to Americans under duress. The plan was initially to get Pakistan divided through riots in karachi, sectarian crisis in Pakistan and dividing people on ethnic lines like MQM and ANP. The plan was weak since it could not get the full throttle or support from the Pakistani leadership. But, after the installation of corrupt and stooge of Americans in the shape Zardari-Gillani, the plan got the smooth sailing since they agreed to abide by the rules , to get american support, guarantees from American establishment for the promised money in their accounts in swiss banks, safety of their families and above all to execute the plan covertly for their benefits. Hussain Haqqani and Zardari knew about the operation of Osama in Pakistan, memo was written as both Zaradri/Gillani feared backlash from the army for their disloyalty to the Pakistani people and felt chicken to save their power position.

Comments are closed.