Iran slams foreign interference in Afghanistan

44
190

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad lashed out against foreign interference in the region following talks in Pakistan on Friday designed to help chart a political solution in Afghanistan.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai called for action rather than words after the three-way summit hosted by President Asif Ali Zardari, as Kabul seeks to enlist Islamabad’s assistance in bringing the Taliban to the negotiating table.
Pakistan was again forced to deny that it was playing a double game in supporting the militia, whose leaders are thought to have close ties to at least elements in the Pakistani military.
“All problems are coming from outside. In order to promote their goals and ambitions… they don’t want to allow our nations to develop,” Ahmadinejad told a news conference, in a clear, but unnamed allusion to the West.
Central to the summit was the 10-year war in Afghanistan, where the United States ads a foreign troop contingent of 130,000 and where all parties to the conflict now accept that negotiations are the only solution to the fighting.
“We are here to strengthen the steps in order to solidify cooperation among the three nations. We are going to move towards removing the problems… and we should deny others the opportunity to interfere,” Ahmadinejad said.
Pakistan said this month it will do anything required by Kabul to support an Afghan-led peace process, but there is a wide degree of scepticism in Afghanistan and the United States about its sincerity.
“What we need now is to formulate a policy that is actionable and implementable and actually act upon it,” Karzai told the news conference.
Relations between Kabul and Islamabad are traditionally mired in distrust, but both sides have made overtures towards reconciliation to facilitate a political solution in Afghanistan designed to ease regional instability.
“Our meeting today at the tripartite of the three countries was one that was futuristically orientated with recognition of the opportunities and dangers around,” the Afghan leader said.
Karzai told the Wall Street Journal in an interview this week that secret three-way contacts had taken place with the Taliban. The militia denied any talks. The White House said it was taking part in Afghan-led reconciliation.
Islamabad is moving towards a detente in its own relations with Washington, which took a drastic turn for the worse over last year’s covert American raid that killed Osama bin Laden and air strikes that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.
“I deny this notion that any of our armed forces are directly or indirectly involved,” he told a news conference when asked about evidence pointing to the involvement of Pakistani spies and officials in the conflict.
“Yes I cannot deny that there is a residue in Pakistan of the war that was fought against the Soviet Union,” he said referring to Pakistan’s involvement in the 1980s war in Afghanistan that gave rise to the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.
“The three presidents you see sitting together, we shall fight this menace. Nobody is more concerned or more involved in it than me personally,” he said.
But despite strong US objections, Pakistan says it is pressing ahead with a multi-billion-dollar project to build a gas pipeline to import fuel from Iran.
Israel this week accused Iran of targeting its diplomats in Georgia, India and Thailand, against a backdrop of speculation that the Jewish state or the United States could be months from launching military strikes against Iran.

44 COMMENTS

  1. – US for launching military strikes against Iran? lol Whats with all the bluffing, why dont they just dare to try…We’ll see what our 2.1 billion muslims would do after!

  2. – US for launching military strikes against Iran? lol Whats with all the bluffing, why dont they just dare to try…We’ll see what our 2.1 billion muslims would do after!

  3. – US for launching military strikes against Iran? lol Whats with all the bluffing, why dont they just dare to try…We’ll see what our 2.1 billion muslims would do after!

  4. – US for launching military strikes against Iran? lol Whats with all the bluffing, why dont they just dare to try…We’ll see what our 2.1 billion muslims would do after!

  5. – US for launching military strikes against Iran? lol Whats with all the bluffing, why dont they just dare to try…We’ll see what our 2.1 billion muslims would do after!

  6. – US for launching military strikes against Iran? lol Whats with all the bluffing, why dont they just dare to try…We’ll see what our 2.1 billion muslims would do after!

  7. – US for launching military strikes against Iran? lol Whats with all the bluffing, why dont they just dare to try…We’ll see what our 2.1 billion muslims would do after!

  8. – US for launching military strikes against Iran? lol Whats with all the bluffing, why dont they just dare to try…We’ll see what our 2.1 billion muslims would do after!

  9. Its a matter of shame that "Islamic republic of pakistan" has no criteria for the rulers.

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is the son of a poor person (iron worker, blacksmith, grocer).He himself an engineer & a teacher. As per law he can not be elected for 3rd term.

    Compare this with pakistani GOLD MAN, assets 1.5b$plus, richest in pakistan, Spent 10 years in Jail on corruption charges,His background is the elite rulling class.Wants to stay in power forever.

    Long live pakistan.

  10. Despite of US objection over multi-billion-dollar Fuel Gas pipe line Project. Pakistan should go ahead with this project and consider the fuel requirement of the country in their priority and come out of fear of America. Further As Pre Zardari said they will not support US for any possible attack on Iran , Its really a positive statement. Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan should initiate mechanism for encouraging tri-lateral Trade, share of Technology and specialization in different fields they can also include China in the loop. If they can go in this direction believe me we can threat America instead of getting dictation and victimization of US aggression.

Comments are closed.