Veena Malik: ‘I am not spying for ISI’

41
244

Controversy queen, Veena Malik has denied allegations of spying for the ISI in a Delhi court which looked into a complaint against her after her alleged nude photographs appeared in an Indian magazine. The photos saw her sporting an ‘ISI’ tattoo on her arm. The complaint had said that the tattoo indicated that she was spying for the Pakistani intelligence agency which should be probed. Malik had denied that she posed naked for the magazine, claiming the cover photo was doctored. The complainant had alleged that Malik’s semi nude photograph published in the magazine had hurt public sentiments and that she was staying in India to spy for ISI. Apart from Malik, the magazine and its owner have also been named as party in the complaint. Mahidul Hassan, a local imam, had filed the complaint against Malik on sedition charges.

41 COMMENTS

  1. The magazine has explained numerous times why the letters ISI were on her arm. She shouldn’t have needed to explain herself. If she were an ISI spy she wouldn’t advertise that fact by printing that agency’s name on her arm on photos to be viewed by millions of people.

  2. The magazine has explained numerous times why the letters ISI were on her arm. She shouldn’t have needed to explain herself. If she were an ISI spy she wouldn’t advertise that fact by printing that agency’s name on her arm on photos to be viewed by millions of people.

  3. The magazine has explained numerous times why the letters ISI were on her arm. She shouldn’t have needed to explain herself. If she were an ISI spy she wouldn’t advertise that fact by printing that agency’s name on her arm on photos to be viewed by millions of people.

  4. The magazine has explained numerous times why the letters ISI were on her arm. She shouldn’t have needed to explain herself. If she were an ISI spy she wouldn’t advertise that fact by printing that agency’s name on her arm on photos to be viewed by millions of people.

  5. The magazine has explained numerous times why the letters ISI were on her arm. She shouldn’t have needed to explain herself. If she were an ISI spy she wouldn’t advertise that fact by printing that agency’s name on her arm on photos to be viewed by millions of people.

  6. The magazine has explained numerous times why the letters ISI were on her arm. She shouldn’t have needed to explain herself. If she were an ISI spy she wouldn’t advertise that fact by printing that agency’s name on her arm on photos to be viewed by millions of people.

  7. The magazine has explained numerous times why the letters ISI were on her arm. She shouldn’t have needed to explain herself. If she were an ISI spy she wouldn’t advertise that fact by printing that agency’s name on her arm on photos to be viewed by millions of people.

  8. The magazine has explained numerous times why the letters ISI were on her arm. She shouldn’t have needed to explain herself. If she were an ISI spy she wouldn’t advertise that fact by printing that agency’s name on her arm on photos to be viewed by millions of people.

  9. Why the fuk would people so much Point out VEENA MAILK? Dont they have something else to do?? these guys gave the same treatment to Dr.Aamir liaquat! u r the bunch of As*holes!! :

  10. The magazine has explained numerous times why the letters ISI were on her arm. She shouldn't have needed to explain herself. If she were an ISI spy she wouldn't advertise that fact by printing that agency's name on her arm on photos to be viewed by millions of people.

Comments are closed.