US should contain Pakistan Army’s excesses: Riedel

The United States must shift to a strategy of engaging Pakistan while containing the worst “excesses” of its army, an expert who helped develop the current US approach to Islamabad said Monday.
After coming to power in January 2009, President Barack Obama tasked Bruce Riedel, a former CIA officer, to chair an interagency review of policy towards Afghanistan and Pakistan for the White House. The review urged close dialogue with Pakistan and an intensification of drone attacks against extremist militants in the tribal areas in northwestern Pakistan.
“That strategy made sense at the time but I think in the light of developments, it’s time to shift to a policy of engagement and containment,” said Riedel, now a senior fellow at The Brookings Institution think-tank.
“That is to say to continue to engage Pakistan to try to support the development of civilian democracy, to try to help Pakistani economic development but at the same time trying to contain the worst ambitions and excesses of the Pakistani army.”
Speaking at a panel discussion, he said that for now, Washington was “not doing enough on the containment part. We’re slipping and sliding into it, but I think without a coherent framework.”
US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Obama administration had no plans to adopt such a policy at this time.
Ties between Washington and Islamabad took a turn for the worse after a US special operations raid killed Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in the Pakistani garrison town of Abbottabad in May. Relations slid to a new low last month when NATO air strikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers on the Afghan border, prompting Pakistan to boycott the Bonn Conference on Afghanistan’s future.
According to Riedel, the Pakistani army is gradually installing a new military dictatorship, without even needing to resort to a coup. “The new military dictatorship that is emerging in Pakistan will be very different from its predecessors,” he said. “The facade of civilian government is likely to continue to go on… with very little real power. The media will continue to be very active and alive, except when they criticise the military.”