Law doesn’t permit taking voice sample: Malik


Interior Minister Rehman Malik on Monday said the country’s constitution did not permit taking voice samples of any accused, but it would still ‘’exhaust’’ all possible means to provide voice samples of the 26/11 suspects to India.
He said Pakistan could not be alone held responsible for the delay in the trial of the Mumbai attack’s accused in a Rawalpindi court, saying India should share the blame for taking almost a year in granting permission to a Pakistani judicial commission to visit India.
Malik said according to the Pakistan Penal Code and the Act of Evidence, the only identification of an accused acceptable was the thumb impression and no photograph or voice of any accused could be taken per the law.
“If I give the samples by any other means by recording their voice and send it to India, that will be challenged in Pakistani court and there will be contempt of court on the investigators and prosecutors,” he told PTI in an interview.
Malik said the government’s appeal to allow it to take voice samples of the accused was rejected by a lower court and he had discussed the issue with his Indian counterpart P Chidambaram.
“What is important is to go through the legal channel. So in the first level in the court, it was rejected – that government was not allowed to take samples of voice. Then we move to the next stage – the higher court, where we have appealed against the order of the lower court to allow the government to take the samples from the accused enabling us to send it to India,” he said.
Saying his government’s intention was clear about bringing the perpetrators of 26/11 Mumbai attack to justice, the minister said his government will “exhaust” all possible means to give voice samples to India.
“The moment the court permits us, we will definitely send (the voice samples to India). If the high court rejects, we will go to the Supreme Court. We will exhaust every possible stage. We are doing (it) transparently and you can examine the law,” he said.
When reminded that he had told Chidambaram during their one-on-one meeting in Islamabad last year that India would “not be disappointed” over its request for the voice samples, Malik said he stood by the assurance and New Delhi must understand the fact the Pakistan government was being governed by its constitution.
“I will still say that you will not be disappointed. But one must understand that we are being governed by certain sections of the constitution. So, now what is important is how to get that. I discussed (that) with Chidambaram in detail,” he said.
Referring to the trial of the seven accused in the 2008 Mumbai attacks in a Pakistani court, Malik said the delay “is there and the delay is not solely because of Pakistan. It is because the incident had happened in a second country”.
“Now since the final charge sheet is already submitted and the accused have been arrested and their bails were rejected at the level of Supreme Court, the moment the judicial commission returns back (from India) after their work, I am sure it will go in fast track… but you know they (India) examined our request for the judicial commission almost a year,” he said.
Best efforts: Malik said his government had done its best and the investigators produced enough proof against the accused and they were likely to be convicted.
He said there were two parts in the issue – one was the investigation and prosecution and the other was judicial process.
“As far is the investigation is concerned, we have done our part. We have brought them to justice. Now it is up to the court. Obviously, no side can influence the court. Our intention is very clear,” he said.
The minister said the matter got delayed because the court wanted a judicial commission and now the government was taking permission for the constitution of the judicial commission and it was sure that the permission would be given. “So it is important that you cannot bypass the law,” he said.
On India’s request to send a commission to Pakistan in connection with the 26/11 probe, Malik said his country agreed on the commission. “When a request comes, it will be examined by the concerned law department and if they agree, it will be allowed to visit,” he added.
“That is what we did. We sent the request, it was examined by your government and they allowed us. And when they will send the request, we will examine and we will respond positively,” he said