Iran fuel ban targets NATO but hurts Afghans


KABUL – Iran’s ban on fuel tankers crossing into Afghanistan over claims they are supplying NATO troops is snaring ordinary Afghans in a complex power game as winter living costs rise, experts say.
Some 2,000 trucks are stranded on the Iranian-Afghan border, Afghanistan’s commerce ministry says, in a standoff which has run since early December, heaping more misery on civilians in the war-torn, impoverished country.
Behind it all is Iran’s desire to strike out at the international community over its disputed nuclear weapons programme and at Afghanistan over efforts to make peace with the Taliban, according to some analysts.
NATO insists it does not use fuel which has passed through Iran and that the operations of its troops in Afghanistan are not being affected.
But that is cold comfort to ordinary Afghans who, with the first snows of winter on the ground, face paying 40 percent more for fuel than before, plus extra for other day-to-day essentials.
The situation has caused a wave of protests outside the Iranian embassy in Kabul, including one last week when angry demonstrators reportedly pelted the building with tomatoes and eggs.
Afghanistan’s Commerce Minister Anwarulhaq Ahadi voiced his frustration at a press conference Sunday, saying: “Iran’s reasons and excuses about this problem are not acceptable for us at all.”
Explaining the problems ordinary Afghans face, Ali Agha, a 50-year-old dried-fruit seller in Kabul, said: “Dried fruit is one of the main needs for people in the winter and people are bargaining while buying it. All I can tell them is that the fuel has become expensive.”
A young chemist, Rahmatullah, added: “Every day, we argue with customers regarding the price of medicine… the medicines are mainly coming from Iran and Pakistan and the fuel price rise has affected prices directly.”
Iran first blocked fuel trucks from crossing into Afghanistan last month because, according to Kabul’s deputy commerce minister, it believed their cargo was going to supply US and other international troops fighting the Taliban.
Afghan Vice President Mohammad Qasim Fahim said last month he had secured an agreement to lift the ban during a visit to Tehran, and the Iranian government insists the question has been settled.
But Faridullah Sherzai, a spokesman for the commerce ministry in Kabul, said only 40 trucks per day were being allowed through from Iran to Afghanistan, while local drivers put the figure at around half that.
Sherzai stressed that other routes were available for fuel coming into Afghanistan, through Pakistan and central Asian countries. But it is thought that around 30 percent of Afghanistan’s fuel comes through Iran.
Afghanistan has now submitted details to Iran of how much fuel is needed for its civilian population in a bid to resolve the situation.
An Iranian official blamed Kabul for the crisis.
“The transport of fuel is happening from the Dogharoun border crossing without any problem,” Mohammad Aref Arefi, deputy governor of Taybad province bordering Afghanistan, was quoted as saying on the Iranian state television website.
“If the fuel is not reaching the Afghans, the problem is then with the government of that country.”
He said from the start of current Iranian year in March 2010 until now, “7,024 tankers with 168.5 million litres of fuel crossed from this border point into Afghanistan.”
Gran Hewad, a political researcher at think-tank the Afghan Analysts Network, said Iran was pursuing two strategies by implementing the fuel blockade – one international and one regional.
“From an international point of view, it’s reacting to the recent pressure which the international community brings on it regarding nuclear weapons and some other transactions,” Hewad said.
“In the regional dimension, it’s going to react to the peace process in Afghanistan which it opposes.”