IPL fights for its future amid scandals, confusion

0
200

NEW DELHI: The Indian Premier League revolutionised cricket when it burst onto the scene in 2008 with a high-octane blend of international star players, Twenty20 matches and Bollywood glamour.
But the money-spinning tournament faces an uncertain future with some observers predicting its fourth season, due to start in April, hangs in the balance.
The event has been hit by allegations of massive corruption, money-laundering and tax evasion, as well as secret deals to hide teams’ real owners and even links to India’s criminal underworld.
Shashank Manohar, president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), which owns the league, told AFP he was determined the tournament would survive – and thrive.
“The IPL is a very valuable property for us and it will not be devalued,” he vowed, adding that the next edition may drop the cheerleaders and late-night parties that characterised past matches.
“The focus will be on cricket, not what happens off the field,” he said.
Lalit Modi, the IPL’s founder, was thrown out of the sport by the BCCI in September over accusations about his conduct.
The BCCI has registered a criminal case against him for the misappropriation of 4.68 billion rupees (106 million dollars) and he also faces a government probe for financial irregularities.
Modi, whose brash style personified the IPL, fled India earlier this year – and has consistently denied all the charges against him.
He now lives in self-imposed exile in London, surrounded by bodyguards, as he claims his life is in danger from Mumbai-based gangsters linked to illegal gambling.
Whatever Modi’s fate, the IPL faces many obstacles as it hopes to make a fresh start in 2011.
Two of the original eight franchises, the Rajasthan Royals and Kings XI Punjab, were expelled from the league last month for not declaring changes in their ownership structures. Former Australian spin wizard Shane Warne, who captained the Royals, said the expulsion of his side was staggering, and he questioned whether there was “something sinister behind it”.